Re: [ga] scammers using whois privacy

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Joop, we disagree. Most people do not even know to search the whois to know 
if they are anonymous or not. Those that do should be allowed to in my 
opinion. Educating the public to do this is something that should be done as 
well. Not all who have whois blocked are scammers. They do it because they 
have been told this will help them block spam.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
http://www.articlecontentprovider.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Dena Whitebirch" <shore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] scammers using whois privacy


> This is why  crooks' right of choice to be anonymous should not be taken 
> away: it would become harder for the public to instantly recognize  them 
> and blacklist them as anonimi.
> What Dena does is the first line of defence against scammers. A few lines 
> of browser code could automate the process.
>
>
> Happy New Year to all.
>
> --Joop--
>
> www.icannatlarge.com