<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: article
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ga] Re: article
- From: Patrick Vande Walle <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:57:41 +0200
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=vande-walle.eu; s=secure; t=1144760264; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Organization: User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=l6JWCwGPSDPqXz7jpPwlRQAAM DzqFXzcRr2VCAW8JRFgKjtz7mpG86whZsm56jED3L1l7EvpT89OMJSypKkOwV5qJbFf ptdMnoDz8IZLOAp0LYKkj4en20a5RpUWPoYA
- In-reply-to: <000801c65d58$9af6ab40$0201a8c0@kidsearch4>
- Organization: You must be kidding, right ?
- References: <000801c65d58$9af6ab40$0201a8c0@kidsearch4>
- Reply-to: patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
kidsearch wrote:
> *http://allafrica.com/stories/200604101362.html*
>
This gentleman only tells part of the story. As per RFC 1591, he should
be able to demonstrate that "Significantly interested parties in the
domain should agree that the designated manager is the appropriate party."
Interested parties can be numerous and can include government, chamber
of commerce, consumer unions, local Internet community and
organizations, etc.
It sounds like this gentleman is running a company (Uganda Online Ltd.)
and is afraid of losing business.
Obviously, the Internet has changed a lot since 1995 when he got the
delegation. Nowhere is it said that things are cast in stone and cannot
be challenged when local conditions change.
Patrick Vande Walle
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|