<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Karl's comments at the 2003 Senate hearings on allocation systems
- To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Karl's comments at the 2003 Senate hearings on allocation systems
- From: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:52:31 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20051220142212.40957.qmail@web53503.mail.yahoo.com>
- References: <20051220142212.40957.qmail@web53503.mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Danny Younger wrote:
Re: "If a TLD fails, why should ICANN do anything
about it?"
ICANN Board member Mike Palage, in his Registry
Failure White Paper writes:
"One of the important aspects to be considered in connection with a gTLD
registry failure is in the impact on Internet stakeholders, most
importantly domain name registrants
It is very ironic that ICANN makes such a statement while ICANN continues
to exclude those very same domain name registrants from the making of
decisions within ICANN.
There's a strong scent of King Leopold saying that Belgium was really
acting in the best interests of the people of the Congo basin and that
they should have faith in his paternalist judgements.
--karl--
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|