ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Coalition For ICANN Transparency

  • To: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Coalition For ICANN Transparency
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:42:22 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=v3tsuNm8KU7xe9Bnp3JGveXnK3ESlrPlQGVTxuco8orMeJcnUQB0Vm1f49LExyKmG6ID7NjbdQ9I//g/9A5HFjCeD9nVxZnzAjOsH1541JJR54wljN5ToYXhqnnP3vIxGjpxe7c1qs/R8NfBunkrpY8H5Rcr0cNZeKrJOyltpM4= ;
  • In-reply-to: <002201c5f061$b2b4e260$042cfd3e@richard>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This would be unnattainable. For in responding you would reveal too much and therefor become transparent. Which may lead to problems of 
  bottom up involvement ;-)
  e

Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  ICANN should also develop a "Responsiveness Policy" where they undertake to
respond to mail in "x" days because that is also part of being open and
transparent: not just evading reasonable questions because it suits them to
ignore correspondence. And they should make themselves accountable to
third-party scrutiny if they fail to uphold their Responsiveness Policy.

Come to that, the concept of a much more independent third-party
ombudsman/woman would also be a good step towards openness and transparency.

The only accountability that really matters to ICANN is its accountability
to the DoC of the USA.

That is insufficient accountability.

Richard H

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vittorio Bertola" 
To: "Danny Younger" 
Cc: 
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Coalition For ICANN Transparency


> Danny Younger ha scritto:
> > I spotted an interesting website at
> > http://www.cfit.info/
>
> I'm not sure about who is behind the initiative, but I think it's due
> time that ICANN works out how to make its accountability and
> transparency much better. Actually, we released a statement in
> Luxembourg to this effect:
> http://www.icann.org/presentations/alac-statements-lux-14jul05.pdf
> and, of course, it was duly ignored. I think we'll get back on this
> matter in Vancouver.
> -- 
> vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
> http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Prima o poi...

  


		
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Personals
 Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
Lot's of someone's, actually. Yahoo! Personals
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>