<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Coalition For ICANN Transparency
- To: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Coalition For ICANN Transparency
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:18:44 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=0XEcyrX7U/AIBOZN2UrHoAG/Pm7sytri+4wVqfhXAfaAQ6E4R1j2X+GxZT8jOsGid/IPfvG70SRZvfIGAuih4dOH92A09Ewy+GUspjIN4p+ywWhfguBdxKcChheWL7zzEqleRGZFDcePvXPA4QFBHymgoU+b+PFMbMLxMjoinh8= ;
- In-reply-to: <43843357.1080604@bertola.eu.org>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Vittorio,
As I'm sure you recall, there was no Public Comment
Period for the .JOBS contract, or for the .TRAVEL
contract, or for the .NET contract. As long as you
are on speaking terms with the Board, perhaps you can
ask them why they are denying the Public their right
to comment.
Best regards,
Danny
--- Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Danny Younger ha scritto:
> > I spotted an interesting website at
> > http://www.cfit.info/
>
> I'm not sure about who is behind the initiative, but
> I think it's due
> time that ICANN works out how to make its
> accountability and
> transparency much better. Actually, we released a
> statement in
> Luxembourg to this effect:
>
http://www.icann.org/presentations/alac-statements-lux-14jul05.pdf
> and, of course, it was duly ignored. I think we'll
> get back on this
> matter in Vancouver.
> --
> vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a]
> bertola.eu.org]<-----
> http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Prima o poi...
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|