ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] IANA Functions Contract Modification

  • To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] IANA Functions Contract Modification
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:57:42 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=aqGpUz7TjmckhzLmWvGfkjGXwxiHB/rz9HtKEg+WWnwrFzI8RuUvaeGNDgw1B9KpNZoCFGE7AQ6oZTGhxnm/UtO9jbez9XgZ1k0JvMJmXcBQARRNE7t6ckaj6az7WvcXwvuipp5vMPuB0vC7TutfCGmBTMmv36UIMvkpP9qvM0c= ;
  • In-reply-to: <20051109134413.14857.qmail@web52906.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eric,

It appears as if NTIA is now in hands-on learning mode
prior to putting the IANA Functions contract up for
bid.  

NTIA is using the following language on their forms:

"Provide detailed narrative of the current activity
for each open change request and ICANN's proposed
steps to process the subject request within the
prescribed 30-day limit.  These entries should also
indicate possible complications that might arise in
connection with processing the request, as well as
Contractor's methods for addressing these issues."

I would guess that they need to learn what really
happens at the IANA on a day-by-day basis in order to
impart some guidance to the next IANA Functions
contractor.

You'll note that they've dropped the pretense that
they're dealing with IANA as they clearly mention
ICANN by name on page 5.


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>