ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] RE: GA irrelevant

  • To: karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx, icann-board@xxxxxxxxx, rod_beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] RE: GA irrelevant
  • From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:39:07 -0500 (GMT-05:00)

Karl and all,

  Here here Karl!  But as you know this dymanic is not
seemingly understood let alone recognized by ICANN
'Officials' for reason or reasons not factually known
and/or accurately articulated.

We have had this discussion many times before.  The 
results end up unchanged as far as the ICANN structure
is concerned, including most especially the GNSO.  This is
one of several reasons that the GA should or I have and will
continue to argue needs full reinstatement and recognition
as the mix of entities represented by either their activities,
domain names, or presence/use of the Internet are so in reality
so important. Hence the GA is VERY Relevent, but largely 
not properly or appropriately recognized...  A sad comentary... 


-----Original Message-----
>From: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: May 26, 2010 3:52 AM
>To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
>Cc: GNSO GA Mailing List <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [ga] RE: GA  irrelevant
>
>
>On 05/25/2010 09:19 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>> Non commercial registrants don't need a miracle.  The Noncommercial
>> Stakeholder Group (NCSG) already allows for individual noncommercial
>> registrants to apply for membership.
>
>It's easy to box those legal fictions known as "corporations" and 
>"associations" and "partnerships" into commercial (or not) boxes - 
>that's because their formation and legal existence is premised on their 
>engagement in economic activities.
>
>But human registrants don't fit nicely into the "commercial" and 
>"non-commercial" buckets.  We people simultaneously bathe in the stream 
>of commerce and the stream of non-commercial life.
>
>It's rather Procrustean to cut and stretch us in order to fit us onto 
>ICANN's "non-commercial" iron bed.
>
>For example, my "cavebear.com" is used by me for both commercial and 
>non-commercial purposes.  I am just as much at home in ICANN's 
>commercial groups as in the non-commercial ones.
>
>And one's activities may change their color over time - for instance 
>things like Google started out as non-commercial experiments by 
>individual people.
>
>(By-the-way, I agree with Roberto that the burden of moving forward is 
>on the aspirants to form the new group.  I was just suggesting that 
>ICANN's board give a nod of encouragement.)
>
>       --karl--
>
>

Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300+k members/stakeholders and growing, 
strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>