Re: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec

[Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John:

Hugh knows how to investigate. He's not going to pay much attention to your
babble. He's interested in the hard facts. Like why did Martijn Burger write
this letter? http://bit.ly/a0hTZ4 Is he lying too - or why is a student
committing fraud against his school? http://bit.ly/7It7ej Is the principle
lying too? And what of the criminal and commercial fraud perpetuated by you
and your colleagues at the TLDA against Henk Smit and Eric MacIver ... a
former TLD member.

These are the issues Hugh will deal with - not the false libelous
accusations you craft here.

As for your "threats" to follow me to the ends of twitter and facebook - I
accept your challenge. I see these "threats" more as "opportunities" to
spread the word. People on facebook and twitter have accessed you as my
personal Internet stalker which makes me a bit of a celebrity. To your
benefit your twitter page shows http://bit.ly/91lovb me you have a total of
28 followers. Thats one more follower then you had last week - and I take
credit for that. Also I have you libeling and slandering me in multiple
languages - which I think is novel.

I know how to use an obsessed personality. Follow away.

cheers
joe baptista



On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:34 AM, John Palmer <
jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Hugh - I hope you undertsand by now that none of Joe's claims about
> criminality and fraud in
> Europe have been proven true, in fact, evidence is that he was the only one
> who committed any
> kind of offense (stealing a bike).
>
> All of Joe's "evidence" is just his own writings on his silly little
> website that he crafts in a way to
> make them look like news articles that he has pinched from somewhere else.
> The casual (read: lazy)
> observer visiting his website will be fooled into thinking that they are
> authoritative. They are not.
>
> I have investigated his latest scam - the Gymnasium Querfurt incident and
> the results show that he
> pounced on more innocent victims in his mad vendetta against Herman Xennt
> and his group. The
> results of my investigation are here:
>
> http://lair.lionpost.net/pipermail/baptista-offenses/2010-April/000021.html
>
> He dragged an innocent high school student into his swirling pit of
> psychosis and annoyed the principal of
> a top school in Germany by pretending to be someone of knowledge and
> authority, which  he is most
> certainly IS NOT.
>
> If you want an accurate depiction of what Joe did in Holland in 2005 - the
> damage he caused - see
> here for the real story:
>
>
> http://inaic.com/index.php?p=internet-terror
>
> Now Joe, if you want me to stop following you around to correct your lies, 
> misrepresentations, half truths and paranoid
> ravings, you need to be quiet:
>
> You will NEVER AGAIN call Herman or the people in Europe crooks, refer to 
> their businesses and crooked, tell the lie that they
> are criminals, tax cheats or other vile things WHICH THEY ARE NOT.
>
> You will NEVER, EVER again call anyone a "welfare bum" or insult members of 
> their family or discuss those members on
> a public list without the person's permission.
>
> You will NEVER again claim that you in any way have any authority in the TLDA 
> or that you are even a member or have
> any right to tell the organization how to conduct its business.
>
> You will NEVER EVER engage in any other slander or other bad behavior in the 
> inclusive namespace. You will NEVER EVER EVER
> again seek to destroy or disrupt any registry, registrar, TLD reseller, root 
> operator or other DNS professional in the Inclusive Namespace.
>
> You will avoid causing any other trouble to this industry or any other 
> industry or cause that is important to me and the others
> with which  I associate.
>
> If you continue to violate these rules, I will follow you around and pummel 
> you into dust each and every time you open your filthy,
> slanderous and psychotic mouth so that the poor listeners can be given the 
> truth about you and your destructive lies. This is a page I
> am taking out of Tom Evan's book.
>
> GOT THAT, JOE.
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>  *From:* Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* cet1@xxxxxxxxx ; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA<ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx+%3E%3E+GA>; 
> Joe
> Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc:* Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ; Bind Users Mailing 
> List<bind-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Timothe
> Litt <litt@xxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:15 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec
>
>   Fair trade is necessary trade. Unnecessary tradeoffs are lame. These
> problems are not necessary -- except that they are within the given
> framework of lack of motivation to do better.  It comes down to this, if we
> set our standards outside of competitive models there is no incentive to do
> better.  ICANN, the Dnssec and this SAIC are working within government
> sanctioned slobbery, both intellectual and economic slobbery.  I used to
> think it was snobbery, now I know it is a laziness born of shovel leaning
> bureaucrats. You may be kind and call it "make work" but would you call
> intentional fraud "make work"? Buggy whips and Railroad fireman is what this
> is.
>
> The plan I am putting together for the inculsives will generate some new
> fire under the pants of these obstructionists and they will find that a
> better mousetrap can be built.
>
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 4/22/10, Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec
> To: cet1@xxxxxxxxx, "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Paul Wouters" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bind Users Mailing List" <
> bind-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Timothe Litt" <litt@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010, 8:07 AM
>
> Looks like the future of the DNSSEC make work project includes resolution
> failures here and there. More security - less stability - guaranteed
> slavery. I wounder if it's a fair trade.
>
> we'll see ..
> regards
> joe baptista
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Chris Thompson 
> <cet1@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cet1@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
>
>> On Apr 22 2010, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Timothe Litt wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm having trouble resolving uspto.gov with bind 9.6.1-P3 and 9.6-ESV
>>>> configured as valdidating resolvers.
>>>>
>>>> Using dig, I get a connection timeout error after a long (~10 sec)
>>>> delay.
>>>> +cdflag provides an immediate response.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is anyone else seeing this?  Ideas on how to troubleshoot?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have the same problems with our validating unbound instance.
>>>
>>
>> I suspect that this has to do with
>>
>>  dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @dns1.uspto.gov.
>>  dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @sns2.uspto.gov.
>>
>> failing with timeouts, while   dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey uspto.gov @
>> dns1.uspto.gov.
>>  dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey uspto.gov @dns2.uspto.gov.
>>
>> work fine ... with a 1736-byte answer. Probably the fragmented
>> UDP response is getting lost somewhere near the authoritative
>> servers themselves.
>>
>> --
>> Chris Thompson
>> Email: 
>> cet1@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cet1@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=bind-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>>
>
>
>
>