Re: [ga] Proposal: ICANN should cease acceptance of PDF, DOC and other attachments from public comments

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Does this proposal in any way hinder/hamper/impede developing nations users or 
developed nations poorer users from access?

--- On Sun, 1/24/10, George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ga] Proposal: ICANN should cease acceptance of PDF, DOC and other 
attachments from public comments
To: "GNSO GA Mailing List" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, January 24, 2010, 10:03 AM



Hi folks,

Given the numerous vulnerabilities in attachment formats, including PDF:

http://blogs.adobe.com/psirt/2009/12/new_adobe_reader_and_acrobat_v.html

I propose that ICANN cease to accept all public comments that are in any format 
other than ASCII or Unicode text.

The public tends to read the comments of others who've posted on the comment 
archives, and it would be very easy for a malevolent individual or group to 
hack those who read the public comments. Since ICANN staff themselves read 
public comments, it would not take much for an attacker to take advantage of 
this fact to gain entrance into the internal networks of ICANN, and potentially 
wreak havoc or gain commercial (or even political) advantage through spying.

If some of the largest companies, including Google, can be vulnerable to being 
hacked, ICANN should be more sensitive to that potential, and take reasonable 
steps to safeguard its staff and the public who read comments. There is very 
little to be gained in permitting PDF/DOC and other attachments, and much risk 
added by accepting those formats.

Perhaps those submitting comments in those formats can be redirected to an 
online form hosted by ICANN, to allow them to cut/paste from their original 
submissions in order to resubmit them in plain text.

The same policy should apply to documents posted on other ICANN and 
constituency mailing lists.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.leap.com/