ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [SPAM] Re: [ga] Alternative Domain Name Distribution Models

  • To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: [ga] Alternative Domain Name Distribution Models
  • From: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:37:46 -0700


Tim Ruiz wrote:


 However, as I
have pointed out before in similar discussions, there is not one gTLD I
know of that does not have multiple accredited registrars offering it.

If .ewe were ever to get into the NTIA/ICANN/Verisign root zone, it would not be using accredited registrars, or registrars at all.

Not using registrars is not a violation of any law; it is perfectly lawful behaviour.

What legal right does ICANN have to impose such requirements as a condition of entry into the world's only viable marketplace of domain names? Isn't that restraint of trade?

I'm glad that you mentioned the cost and effort required to build a brand. But building brand recognition for a TLD does not necessarily mean using registrars for that TLD; that's a business choice.

                --karl--



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>