<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[dow2tf] Section 1.1 and 1.2 werew what I sent... not local law findings. /sorry, I just used Tom's email to forward/should have relabeled. apologies.
- To: <dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [dow2tf] Section 1.1 and 1.2 werew what I sent... not local law findings. /sorry, I just used Tom's email to forward/should have relabeled. apologies.
- From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 14:30:11 -0400
- Cc: "Bruce Tonkin (E-mail)" <bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Barbara Roseman (E-mail)" <roseman@xxxxxxxxx>, "Paul Verhoef (E-mail)" <paul.verhoef@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso. Secretariat (E-mail)" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcQ4QdhA6KwzBQrET3KOjqqd3fkOlgBvMwWQAClR/hAAAaLukA==
- Thread-topic: [dow2tf] Local law findings
Apologies for the confuseion, The previous email I sent had draft Sections 1.1 and 1.2,not local law findings...
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|