ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

dow1-2tf
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [dow1-2tf] Vote for 2 Drafts to send to GNSO Council

  • To: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx, dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [dow1-2tf] Vote for 2 Drafts to send to GNSO Council
  • From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:15:02 -0500
  • Cc: bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <24EAE5D4448B9D4592C6D234CBEBD597062595@stntexch03.cis.neustar.com>
  • Sender: owner-dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>
<P>I will read over the flight to Capetown and post from my blackberry upoin arrival.&nbsp; I have no idea about 
making Jeff's "11.59.59 a.m deadline... I doubt it!&nbsp; But will do it as soon as feasible. Thanks, Jeff and Jordyn 
for your&nbsp;hard work on the TF's endeavors.<BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;From: "Neuman, Jeff" &lt;Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;To: dow1-2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<DIV></DIV>&gt;CC: "'bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" 
&lt;bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: [dow1-2tf] Vote for 2 Drafts to send to GNSO Council
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 20:34:09 -0500
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Ok,&nbsp;&nbsp;I have reworded the contentious section in the 
last few e-mails with
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Milton's suggested language of "in order to preserve the 
operational
<DIV></DIV>&gt;stability, reliability, security, or global interoperability of 
the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Internet's unique identifier systems."
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;With that said, unless I get a strong objection by Monday at 
11:59:59 am
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Eastern US time, I will forward the 2 drafts to the GNSO 
Council.&nbsp;&nbsp; The
<DIV></DIV>&gt;reason I am doing it this way is that in following the e-mail 
chain, I
<DIV></DIV>&gt;believe with the wording change above, it has support from the 
Registrars,
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Registries, Noncommercial, IPC and Business Users 
constituency.&nbsp;&nbsp;In
<DIV></DIV>&gt;addition, I believe the ISPs (Tony and Maggie) expressed 
approval on the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;last call.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Here are the 2 drafts.&nbsp;&nbsp;There have been no changes to 
the Whois
<DIV></DIV>&gt;notification.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;&lt;Whois TF Conflict 
(clean).doc&gt;&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;&lt;WHOIS NOTIFICATION.doc&gt;&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;As stated in the prior e-mails, we will ask the Council to 
formally solicit
<DIV></DIV>&gt;constituency statements on these reports (20 day period), and 
then include
<DIV></DIV>&gt;those statements in a Preliminary Report which will then go out 
for public
<DIV></DIV>&gt;comment.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Thanks.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Director, Law &amp; Policy
<DIV></DIV>&gt;NeuStar, Inc.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Loudoun Tech Center
<DIV></DIV>&gt;46000 Center Oak Plaza
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Building X
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Sterling, VA 20166
<DIV></DIV>&gt;p: (571) 434-5772
<DIV></DIV>&gt;f: (571) 434-5735
<DIV></DIV>&gt;e-mail: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;The information contained in this e-mail message is intended 
only for the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential 
and/or
<DIV></DIV>&gt;privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient 
you have
<DIV></DIV>&gt;received this e-mail message in error and any review, 
dissemination,
<DIV></DIV>&gt;distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. 
If you have
<DIV></DIV>&gt;received this communication in error, please notify us 
immediately and
<DIV></DIV>&gt;delete the original message.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;&lt;&lt; WhoisTFConflict(clean).doc &gt;&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;&lt;&lt; WHOISNOTIFICATION.doc &gt;&gt;
<DIV></DIV></div></html>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>