<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Preliminary planning for ICANN58
Thanks Donna!
The present PDD workload fully justifies a timeline of 2 policy meetings
per year for at least 2017 and 2018!
Let´s be creative to include efficient quality time during Policy
meetings for AoC reviews and CCWGs in the same 4 day framework (so far
those smaller meetings not being integral part of the “new
strategy”) and the payback in terms of volunteers time and ICANN´s
resources would be amazing!!!!
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 29 Nov 2016, at 14:03, Austin, Donna wrote:
I agree 100% -- let's have two policy meetings a year and one AGM with
bells and whistles.
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. [mailto:crg@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:58 AM
To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James M. Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Michele Neylon - Blacknight
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Edward Morris <egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx>; GNSO
Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Preliminary planning for ICANN58
Dear Donna,
I´m aware of the background and the great design work based on past
experience.
But I just have to say that the new meeting meeting ‘strategy’
was largely designed to pelase everybody and before we could measure
the impact of the new empowered community CCWGs, overlapping AoC
reviews, and 1000+ new gTLDs and GDD exclusive gatherings, which
require an increasing number of small meetings along the year at great
cost and expense.
Having said that, I must confess that Helsinki was a great surprise in
“policy-efficiency” and reduced non-sense I would like to emulate
as far as possible. Looking forward, we should take the best of the
new meetings format (and forget such ones as Hyderabad). Nobody said
we can keep improving.
Lets hope for an ICANN58 where we can work effectively.
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 29 Nov 2016, at 12:32, Austin, Donna wrote:
Hi Carlos
While your suggestion makes perfect sense the reality is that the
smaller meeting B, ie Policy Meetings, were designed to enable ICANN
to host meetings in locations predominately in the African and LAC
regions that can no longer host the larger ICANN meetings.
Prior to the establishment of the Meeting Strategy Working Group
(MSWG), Nick Tomasso published a proposal suggesting that hub
locations be used, although Nick called them Consolidated Meeting
Locations, and adjusted the rotation through regions. Nick's proposal
was rejected and the MSWG was established.
Nick's proposal is available at:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_
system_files_files_meetings-2Dproposal-2D02oct12-2Den.pdf&d=DgIFaQ&c=M
OptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=
yA8iJGrUhu-hw5NhgxHt3EdCjsUkyvV5bP20-TWqVuM&s=VjxwKKLRyU0NB1BxRKcSSn4e
jJsmlDbbj4MD-FjZHzs&e=
The MSWG also discussed the idea of hubs as well but agreed to
continue regional rotation.
Donna
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carlos Raúl
Gutiérrez G.
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 8:16 PM
To: James M. Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Edward
Morris <egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx>; GNSO Council List
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Preliminary planning for ICANN58
Thank you James.
But here we are working on the 2nd derivative: ICANN hubs for Policy
(short) Meetings.
Don´t know if this was also discarded.
Cheers
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 28 Nov 2016, at 20:34,
James
M. Bladel wrote:
Just a note that the Meeting Strategy Working Group examined the
idea
of “rotating hubs”, and rejected them. Mostly by folks from
smaller
and/or more distant locations who were concerned that ICANN would be
permanently absent from their region.
I don’t agree, but that was their finding.
Thanks –
J.
On 11/28/16, 11:59 , "Michele Neylon - Blacknight"
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carlos
Ah ok, so the ICANN hubs.
That makes a lot of sense from a cost and logistics perspective.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.blacknight.host_&d=DgIDaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=obnrvP7RV_mivUaQVS4a9cHatG2L8sNQp2_1kIwp_sE&s=FaInSeTn323WRsWR8goNslPxGC93k3DcGYU7OCw9ITc&e=
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blacknight.blog_&d=DgIDaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=obnrvP7RV_mivUaQVS4a9cHatG2L8sNQp2_1kIwp_sE&s=BBLeE3BW68KILUAfrbPU1A2QibW_i323vb6i4ScSmZA&e=
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.blacknight.pr
ess&d=DgIDaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQi
PHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=obnrvP7RV_mivUaQVS4a9cHatG2L8sNQp2_1kIwp_sE&s=ye6GDL
CGmvX5nyK-bXlJtz8HhIyjwJ2v_iVtg7en5ZE&e=
- get our latest news & media coverage
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.technology.ie&d=DgIDaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=obnrvP7RV_mivUaQVS4a9cHatG2L8sNQp2_1kIwp_sE&s=UqF35Escd-AHTtD7BUEk070IXgPoRhj8AIQh4l8mkmo&e=
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Social:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mneylon.social&d=DgIDaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=obnrvP7RV_mivUaQVS4a9cHatG2L8sNQp2_1kIwp_sE&s=KNiAf1x_B7J-DGe9T9-MNDOBNoW8F9p-cBn7ZGnCPTg&e=
Random Stuff:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__michele.irish&d=DgIDaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=obnrvP7RV_mivUaQVS4a9cHatG2L8sNQp2_1kIwp_sE&s=NbpY0ayyztXyeOS5oDiUMhZctjIU0PEzkq8DWF-ZzVM&e=
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
On 28/11/2016, 11:33, "Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G."
<crg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ICANN hubs: LA, Istambul and Singapore.
I assume that those places are central located in terms of
airlines
logistics, already have a minimum of ICANN staff available,
facilites,
etc. and would greatly reduce the cost to set up meetings (A
recent
meeting of the CCT-RT in Washington DC had to fly in as many
ICANN staff
members as RT members, which calls for more reasonable
places
to meet,
particularly for mainle “working” meetings like the
Policy
Format
calls for).
Cheers
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 26 Nov 2016, at 10:14, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
> Carlos
>
> Which locations would you see as being “hubs”?
>
> Regards
>
> Michele
>
>
> --
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.blacknight.host_&d=DgIDaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=obnrvP7RV_mivUaQVS4a9cHatG2L8sNQp2_1kIwp_sE&s=FaInSeTn323WRsWR8goNslPxGC93k3DcGYU7OCw9ITc&e=
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blacknight.blog_&d=DgIDaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=obnrvP7RV_mivUaQVS4a9cHatG2L8sNQp2_1kIwp_sE&s=BBLeE3BW68KILUAfrbPU1A2QibW_i323vb6i4ScSmZA&e=
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ceo.hosting_&d=DgIDaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=obnrvP7RV_mivUaQVS4a9cHatG2L8sNQp2_1kIwp_sE&s=TvxpqZ3qf1Kb9tLqS36p8YHyCAaxcO1m6pHIzK6VclI&e=
> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside
Business
> Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
> Ireland Company No.: 370845
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|