Re: [council] For your review - GNSO Liaison to the GAC Call for Volunteers

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

I consulted off-line with Wolf-Ulrich and he has suggested that the words
?the liaison is¹ are added to the last paragraph concerning review and
renewal. You will find this proposed change included in redline format in
the version attached (note, I accepted the original redlines so it is easier
to review the change made).

If you have any further comments and/or questions, please share these with
the mailing list prior to the Council meeting on 14 April during which the
Council is expected to consider approval of this process.

Best regards,

Marika

From:  <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Marika Konings
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Tuesday 22 March 2016 at 08:18
To:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Re: [council] For your review - GNSO Liaison to the GAC Call for
Volunteers

Wolf-Ulrich, the intent of the Consultation Group was that the
representative is reconfirmed in the role each year but I agree that it is
not necessarily clear as currently written. Of course, it is up to the
Council to decide whether to agree with this approach or propose
modifications to the review / renewal process.

Best regards,

Marika

From:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Monday 21 March 2016 at 00:31
To:  Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Re: [council] For your review - GNSO Liaison to the GAC Call for
Volunteers

Thanks to Marika!
 
I¹ve only a comment regarding review and renewal. Here we should clearly
distinguish between the role of the liaison and the representative filling
the liaison.
³The role is reviewed and reconfirmed by the GNSO Council in its position
every year² is not clear to me. Either we want to confirm the representative
or not. This should be discussed. We could also discuss whether to do this
annually or on a longer cycle.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 
From: Marika Konings <mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 1:52 AM
To: mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] For your review - GNSO Liaison to the GAC Call for
Volunteers
 
Dear All,
 
As requested during the GNSO Council wrap up session in Marrakech, please
find attached the updated call for volunteers for the GNSO Liaison to the
GAC which reflects in redline format the updates that have been made as
recommended by the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group compared to the original call
for volunteers which took place in 2014. Furthermore you will find also
attached the evaluation sheet that was used by the GNSO leadership as part
of the previous selection process and which is expected to be used for this
round as well. 
 
If you have any comments and/or concerns, please feel free to share these
with the mailing list. The idea is that the Council confirms during its next
meeting its intent to convert this pilot project to a permanent role
following which the call for volunteers would be published as Mason Cole,
the current liaison, has indicated that he is not available to continue in
this position beyond the end of his term at the end of June 2016.
 
Best regards,
 
Marika

Attachment: GNSO Liaison to the GAC - call for candidates - updated 30 March 2016.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature