ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability

  • To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:25:25 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: gnso.icann.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gnso.icann.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=godaddy.com;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=YhIKKc2NqnL8gUl76LyaXOxlARR7drI2lWgEOabSHrk=; b=my6znztp2bDCR01WXeY+IjFLmiLhXdYyv2qw2Ao3x6FK/ytXDtaeu2fNAtZIpgsEWMYQbKMSJBnZzLdfSNQSqbRP1wIs9hnVqJiUSK2OvZRZ3SwHgIjJWD3MDx4J0OlkE9cW9QytDg32pYbOpFls4r+kQF8Wdc2VkNekmhP2frE=
  • In-reply-to: <D2F4A82B.63414%marika.konings@icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D2F36706.62D6B%marika.konings@icann.org> <A416941AD213C9428D623560432AFBB62DDA8873@STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com> <SG2PR06MB11983A3AA2BD05707ED1BBA8CFA60@SG2PR06MB1198.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <D2F4A82B.63414%marika.konings@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
  • Thread-index: AQHRbz16pyb006H4N0u7BC0FsqPKq587sfFQgADqqKaAAKBJAP//phoA
  • Thread-topic: For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability
Colleagues -

After working with Donna, Heather and the GNSO Council Staff, I'm pleased to 
present a Draft Motion for the GNSO Council to consider Work Stream 1 
Recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Report (attached).

Additionally, we have developed a framework outlining the Council's approach 
when it ultimately moves to vote on this motion (also attached).  While there 
is only one motion, the Council also has the option to conduct a vote on each 
of the 12 recommendations separately.  If we go this route, each recommendation 
will include a discussion / statements by Councilors / SGs /Cs, and finally a 
vote.

Once the vote is completed, we will report the results, along with any written 
statements from Councilors, to the co-chairs of the CCWG-Accountability.

Please review and provide feedback.  We can discuss in depth during our next 
session on 29 FEB.

Thank you--

J.

Attachment: Motion on CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations - 25 February 2016.docx
Description: Motion on CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations - 25 February 2016.docx

Attachment: Proposed Approach CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal - 25 February 2016.docx
Description: Proposed Approach CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal - 25 February 2016.docx

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>