Re: [council] Motions for SCI recommendation

[Gabriela Szlak <gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree, thanks!

Gabi

*Gabriela Szlak *


*Skype:* gabrielaszlak

*Twitter: @*GabiSzlak


La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial.
The information in this e-mail is confidential.


2014-11-04 18:56 GMT-03:00 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>:

>
> ok.
>
> I was fine with Mary's original language and I am fine with her new
> language.
> I don't think it changes the nature of the motion.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 05-Nov-14 03:13, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> Yes, the link seems to be working on my end now too. Not sure why it didn’t 
> earlier.
>
> I’m attaching alternative language to the friendly amendment I proposed 
> (thanks to Mary for helping with it). Sort of a friendly amendment to the 
> friendly amendment, I guess. I hope Avri and Gabi find it to be agreeable.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:14 AM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>  On 02-Nov-14 23:53, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
> Two things:
>
> 1. The link to the language the SCI proposed on waiver of the 10-day rule for
> submission of motions doesn’t seem to be working.
>
>  These seem to work for me.  I checked them before sending and just checked 
> them again.
>
>
>  2. I’m suggesting an amendment to the motion; specifically to “Whereas #3”. I
> believe this to be a friendly amendment, as I’m under the impression it is
> consistent with the SCI’s intentions for a recommended change to the operating
> procedures.
>
> The proposed waiver of the 10-day deadline for submission of a motion in 
> section
> 3.3 of the operating procedures will not apply to the deadline for 
> resubmitting
> motions as outlined in sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4. I believe the distinction
> should be made clear in the council motion we will be voting on. When dealing
> with nuances and modifications to process, these subtleties should leave as
> little doubt as possible to their meaning to avoid any confusion that will 
> lead
> to the need for further revisions.
>
> I’ve attached the proposed amendment to this email, and pasted the amended
> language below.
>
>
>  /"The SCI developed language to be inserted in Section 3.3 (Notice of
> Meetings) of the GNSO Operating Procedures that provide for a waiver of the
> prescribed deadline for the submission of anew motion for voting by the GNSO
> Council in certain circumstances provided certain specified criteria are
> met.This waiver will not, however, apply to resubmission of a motionpursuant
> to the requirements, limitations and exceptionsof resubmitting a motion in
> sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4 of the GNSO Operating Procedures."/
>
>   Seems a bit complicated and I am not sure it is necessary, but ok.
>
> avri
>
>
>
>