ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] FW: GNSO Council discussion Spec 13

  • To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [council] FW: GNSO Council discussion Spec 13
  • From: Klaus Stoll <kdrstoll@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:38:54 +0100
  • Cc: philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martinsutton@xxxxxxxx
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=YMEtqRQgrwXMan64WepuXnyF/h+XPiutQqXnrwzx4qo=; b=x+qM6UqrPmvc6iCVRq3LzNpPFgjWqkA7n8dCgIRRKKN5VJYxAcxCCTzhSoY2NUW+U3 vmSF3fpjV4YhnlN2ZsZ1ouTf98O6ryEt3SjhQCp0EHZgeoVMfRsN8bfkfbKFROErZrfX 1YF71vvgUjiMuMWq845dF0yOrje1rbNFWDRUsshm5cn1cZIhWtGILj9amaFO7uy1t2/v TxqATqRQYLDsKJVauH5nqjHlRUY2iKnjeIfn/5W5eHBRgnF+VOK9tCMNM05EtRIDpdLZ JuMZeIGu46jpf4AHCK9gdsgfrEPV/6gN3syoTu96CAGqEJRjvh+oONKe7P+wp4o9LZ2N cBLg==
  • In-reply-to: <019701cf5878$76885640$639902c0$@afilias.info>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <3B6F15E4F09C4236930A46C9E1E2B6C4@ZaparazziL11> <019701cf5878$76885640$639902c0$@afilias.info>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
Dear Jonathan, Dear Philip

Thanks!, that perfectly answers my question. Much appreciated.
That brings me to something different. I there any chance to see the comments, questions and answers too the ICANN legal staff, we might be much clearer and avoid asking questions twice. 

Yours

Klaus

On 4/15/2014 8:01 AM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:


All,

Please see note below from Philip Sheppard.

Jonathan

*From:*BRG [mailto:philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*Sent:* 14 April 2014 17:03
*To:* jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* GNSO Council discussion Spec 13

Jonathan,

I noted that Klaus on the Council list asked this question:
BTW: what happens if a brand gTLD decides down the road to give up exclusivity and become available for general use, at some point that might make perfect business sense. 

As I cannot post to Council, perhaps you would do so for me.

Its a legitimate question and one also asked by ICANN legal staff.
The answer is in other provisions of Spec 13. In the circumstances described by Klaus, all of Spec 13 would immediately no longer apply, and the default RA would apply instead. 

Philip

Philip Sheppard

Director General

Brand Registry Group

www.brandregistrygroup.org <http://www.brandregistrygroup.org/>

Skype phsheppard
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>