ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] FW: GNSO Council discussion Spec 13

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Council discussion Spec 13
  • From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:01:00 +0100
  • Cc: <philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <martinsutton@xxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <3B6F15E4F09C4236930A46C9E1E2B6C4@ZaparazziL11>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Organization: Afilias
  • References: <3B6F15E4F09C4236930A46C9E1E2B6C4@ZaparazziL11>
  • Reply-to: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHBR5ztVOVJYllzN7FPwFruyTlWRpsuYVsA

All,

 

Please see note below from Philip Sheppard.

 

Jonathan

 

From: BRG [mailto:philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 14 April 2014 17:03
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: GNSO Council discussion Spec 13

 

Jonathan,

I noted that Klaus on the Council list asked this question:

BTW: what happens if a brand gTLD decides down the road to give up
exclusivity and become available for general use, at some point that might
make perfect business sense.

 

As I cannot post to Council, perhaps you would do so for me.

 

Its a legitimate question and one also asked by ICANN legal staff.

The answer is in other provisions of Spec 13. In the circumstances described
by Klaus, all of Spec 13 would immediately no longer apply, and the default
RA would apply instead.

 

Philip

 

 

Philip Sheppard

Director General

Brand Registry Group

www.brandregistrygroup.org <http://www.brandregistrygroup.org/>  

Skype phsheppard

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>