<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] can somebody remind me what the "Teresa Swinehart Update" item is on Sunday?
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html
charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word;
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">hi
all,<div><br></div><div>one of the nice things about a poor memory, that is
failing, is the frequent opportunity to go “oh! i remember now!”
:-)</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span"
style="white-space:pre"> </span>oh! i remember
now!</div><div><br></div><div>by the way — i also can’t remember if i shared
this little thought exercise i did on an earlier draft of their recommendations
— the details are wrong now (i haven’t had time to really grind through their
final draft, that’s airplane reading) but the concept still works for me.
i’ve attached that little picture to this
note.</div><div><br></div><div>i think their stuff is fine — but i want to
evaluate the relevance/usefulness of their proposals along at least three
continuums:</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span"
style="white-space:pre"> </span>Goals <—>
Tools</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span"
style="white-space:pre"> </span>Participation <—> Policy Making
</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span"
style="white-space:pre"> </span>Working Groups <—>
SG/Constituencies</div><div><br></div><div>the little picture i’ve attached
only does two dimensions, i thought of the third one later. there may
well be more. </div><div><br></div><div>their work would have been
improved by having a few knowledgeable people selected as part of the “expert
working group", but hey that’s true for almost all of them. we’ve *got*
to defend that “working group” brand better in the future.
</div><div><br></div><div>thanks
all.</div><div><br></div><div>mikey</div><div><br></div><div>PS. sorry
for throwing the NCSG under the bus — i’m quoted as saying that they would be a
great place to experiment with Liquid Democracy. nope, i don’t remember
saying that (see how handy a failing memory is?), but in that particular
instance i also can’t imagine *why* i would have said it. i’ll own the
words, there’s no unringing that bell.
however...</div><div><br></div><div>i bet what i *meant* to say, and
which i think might be true, is that the *constituencies and SGs of the
non-contracted parties house* of the GNSO might be a good place to try some of
those things out. mostly, what i was trying to get at is that there are
some places where some of those ideas would be a Really Bad Idea (working
groups, and the Contracted Parties House). we non-contracted
SG/constituencies have a need to broaden our reach and do a better job of
preparing people to be effective participants in WGs. some of these ideas might
be good things to experiment with. but i like to put myself in the boat
with everybody else, not throw some of us under the bus. sorry about
that.</div><div><br></div><div><img apple-inline="yes"
id="1854C48F-A373-4ABE-B0D2-3580C9CEC07A" height="682" width="909"
apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes"
src="cid:FE78546E-CE42-4502-AEA4-C4594B2FA23F@lan"></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On
Mar 19, 2014, at 6:58 AM, Volker Greimann <<a
href="mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>>
wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
One topic that may be worth raising during the discussion is whether
the work of the panels will be expanded to take into account the
recent developments. I am particularly interested, how ICANN can
develop and implement a truly bottom-up, multistakeholder
accountability structure. Is accountability even an issue for the
strategy panels? It should be...<br>
<br>
<br>
Volker<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 19.03.2014 12:41, schrieb
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20140319044142.a9a203d782c20324abd21efa41e2a5a6.216eed0812.mailapi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
type="cite">
<div>Mikey,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Recall that we originally sought to have Beth Novack, the
chair of the Multi-Stakeholder Innovation Strategy Panel attend
so that there might be a Q-and-A. This was driven by the
initial set of proposals from the Panel and the emergence of
"crowdsourcing" as a legitimate way to make policy.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Staff will be standing in. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Berard</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="threadBlockQuote" style="border-left: 2px solid
#C2C2C2; padding-left: 3px; margin-left: 4px;">---------
Original Message ---------
<div>Subject: Re: [council] can somebody remind me what the
"Teresa Swinehart Update" item is on Sunday?<br>
From: "David Cake" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";><dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></a><br>
Date: 3/18/14 9:23 pm<br>
To: "Mike O'Connor" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx";><mike@xxxxxxxxxx></a><br>
Cc: "Council" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";><council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx></a><br>
<br>
Theresa will be updating us on the MSI panels work before we
have our open discussion about them.
<div> </div>
<div>David</div>
<div><br>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On 19 Mar 2014, at 4:33 am, Mike O'Connor <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx";>mike@xxxxxxxxxx</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">this
is mostly aimed at David Cake or Jonathan. but
any/all are welcome to help out.
<div> </div>
<div>i’m looking at that Teresa Swinehart Update
item on Sunday morning just before the Strat Panel
section. i can’t remember what she’s updating us
*about* can somebody remind me?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>sorry to be so dense,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>mikey</div>
<div> </div>
<div><br>
<div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size:
12px; font-style: normal; font-variant:
normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing:
normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2;
text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px;
text-transform: none; white-space: normal;
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none;
display: inline !important;">PHONE:
651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: <a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.haven2.com/";>www.haven2.com</a>,
HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook,
LinkedIn, etc.)</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><div apple-content-edited="true">
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant:
normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal;
orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust:
auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none;
">PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: <a
href="http://www.haven2.com";>www.haven2.com</a>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for
Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)</span>
</div>
<br></div></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|