ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Durban meeting

  • To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Durban meeting
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:26:14 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <33948A8908484396A6DDD2AB8BAEA985@WUKPC>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <33948A8908484396A6DDD2AB8BAEA985@WUKPC>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHOUfzIAPVH1aF/Sk2QDQoVqkDil5kHrGAF
  • Thread-topic: [council] Durban meeting

Will there be a discussion today on the request by the CSG to not schedule 
anything on Sunday that conflicts with a block of 2.5 hours they would like to 
reserve for constituencies?

Thanks.

Sent from my iPad

On May 16, 2013, at 2:15 AM, "WUKnoben" 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

All,

under item 8 of today’s agenda we’ll discuss the planning for Durban. For your 
preparation I attach a list of categorized proposed topics.
I think the discussion could cover
- comprehensiveness of the agenda
- topic priorities
- ideas with regards to the “Cross Community” meetings

Any further input from your side is welcome.
As discussed in Beijing, to allow for more room of discussion on the topics 
Staff will work with WG Chairs and other presenters to ensure that 
presentations during the weekend session focus on the substance of the issue, 
while any background information is either included as an annex to the 
presentation or covered in a separate paper to allow those that are new or 
unfamiliar with the issue to prepare accordingly.

Looking forward to the meeting today

Wolf-Ulrich
<GNSO Durban Draft Agenda v1.1.xlsx>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>