RE: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations

["Winterfeldt, Brian" <bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Alan - thank you for your quick feedback.  I will circulate a new draft 
shortly and be sure to include the additional information as promised earlier 
as appendices.  I look forward to any additional feedback from the Council.

Best,

Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt
Partner
bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Steptoe

From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:18 AM
To: Winterfeldt, Brian; 'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT 
Recommendations

Brian, several comments:

- does this imply that you will not be sending any of the detailed breakdowns 
by SG/Const, including the explanatory notes that

- the use of the term SG is confusing, as it normally stands for Stakeholder 
Group in the GNSO context.

- Ignoring the possibly confusing abbreviation, giving percentages of the SG 
without any information about its constitution is not very informative.

- the reference to the GNSO's 6 constituencies is unclear, as the GNSO has (I 
think!) five constituencies in two Stakeholder Groups, and two Stakeholder 
Groups without constituencies.

Alan

At 16/10/2012 01:46 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote:

Dear Councilors,

As was discussed in Saturday's session with regard to the WHOIS RT work, 
attached please find a draft letter to the ICANN Board detailing our various 
constituencies' recommendations as to whether a PDP would be required for 
certain WHOIS enhancements.

We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward to hearing 
your views so that we may move forward as soon as possible with providing our 
communication to the Board.  Thank you.

Best regards,

Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt