Re: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Brian, several comments:

- does this imply that you will not be sending any of the detailed 
breakdowns by SG/Const, including the explanatory notes that
- the use of the term SG is confusing, as it normally stands for 
Stakeholder Group in the GNSO context.
- Ignoring the possibly confusing abbreviation, giving percentages of 
the SG without any information about its constitution is not very informative.
- the reference to the GNSO's 6 constituencies is unclear, as the 
GNSO has (I think!) five constituencies in two Stakeholder Groups, 
and two Stakeholder Groups without constituencies.
Alan

At 16/10/2012 01:46 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian wrote:
> Dear Councilors,
>
> As was discussed in Saturday's session with regard to the WHOIS RT 
> work, attached please find a draft letter to the ICANN Board 
> detailing our various constituencies' recommendations as to whether 
> a PDP would be required for certain WHOIS enhancements.
> We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward 
> to hearing your views so that we may move forward as soon as 
> possible with providing our communication to the Board.  Thank you.
> Best regards,
>
> Brian
>
> Brian J. Winterfeldt