ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Community Input and Advice Process Session in Toronto

  • To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Community Input and Advice Process Session in Toronto
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 10:29:28 +0200
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <CC931B7C.20C76%david.olive@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

FYI
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM NetNames France
----------------
Registry Relations and Strategy Director
NetNames
T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61


Début du message réexpédié :

> De : David Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : Rép : [Soac-infoalert] Community Input and Advice Process Session in 
> Toronto
> Date : 4 octobre 2012 17:39:24 HAEC
> À : "soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx" <soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Dear SO-AC Leaders and Colleagues:
> 
> While we  all  are trying to arrange our busy schedules  for the ICANN 
> meeting in Toronto,   I ask for your cooperation to raise awareness about 
> this important issue.  
> 
> This discussion document on this topic was posted for public comment at the 
> request of the Board Governance Committee to solicit views from the ICANN 
> community on ways to enhance the process by which the Board seeks advice from 
> the ICANN community beyond the traditional public comment process.    This 
> issue stems from the work undertaken in fulfillment of recommendation No. 6 
> from the Accountability and Transparency Review Team, and highlights an area 
> where improvements can lead to predictability and consistency for future 
> Board actions. 
> 
>  The Monday session in Toronto was on the schedule as a first step  to draw 
> attention to  this issue and to start an ongoing discussion.   Therefore, I 
> would ask your cooperation to share this notice with your groups, even if 
> participation in this session may not be  possible.  
> 
> Regards,     David
> 
> David A. Olive
> Vice President, Policy Development Support
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> 1101 New York Avenue, NW - Suite 930 
> Washington, D.C.    20005
> Office: 202.570.7126      Mobile:  202.341.3611
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 4 okt 2012, at 15:02, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Dear SO/AC Leaders,
>> 
>> As you may have seen, ICANN Staff posted a document on Community Input and 
>> Advice Process for public comment on 24 September (see 
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/input-advice-function-24sep12-en.htm).
>>  In addition, a session has been scheduled in Toronto to discuss this 
>> subject (see http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34195). The objective of this 
>> public comment forum and the discussion in Toronto is to obtain community 
>> input on the process by which the ICANN Board seeks advice from the 
>> community on topics that are not subject to formal policy development 
>> processes. It is hoped that these discussions could lead to a consistent and 
>> predictable process to be adopted by the ICANN Board for such inquiries. 
>> 
>> For the meeting in Toronto we are putting together an informal panel 
>> discussion during which we would like to hear from the different SO/ACs how 
>> they currently deal which such requests from the Board and provide their 
>> views on the questions that were also outlined in the discussion paper (see 
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/input-advice-function-24sep12-en.pdf):
>> Should standardized processes be created for the Board's receipt of 
>> community input and advice?
>> If so, should such a procedure be standardized across ICANN SOs/ACs, aligned 
>> with the current existing procedures, or should there be some flexibility 
>> among the SOs/ACs (certain parts are required for all, while other parts may 
>> be developed by the respective SO/Acs)
>> How should the Board request this input and advice?
>> What is the most effective and efficient method to deal with the issue topic 
>> identified? Should it be a working group, could current procedures be used? 
>> Who determines which method will be used?
>> Should working groups be chartered for each initiative?
>> How are different parts of the ICANN community expected to work together in 
>> these efforts?
>> What minimum public consultation requirements, if any, should be required 
>> within this function?
>> Who within ICANN lead this effort?
>> We would like to encourage you and/or members of your SO/AC to attend this 
>> session to share your views. If you have any suggestions for panel members, 
>> please feel free to share those off-list with me. The session takes place on 
>> Monday 15 October from 13.30 – 14.45 local time in room Metro Centre. 
>> 
>> With best regards,
>> 
>> Marika
>> 
>> Marika Konings
>> Sr. Policy Director
>> ICANN
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> soac-infoalert mailing list
>> soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert
> 
> _______________________________________________
> soac-infoalert mailing list
> soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>