ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process on Uniformity of Contracts to Address Registration Abuse

  • To: Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process on Uniformity of Contracts to Address Registration Abuse
  • From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 01:16:29 -0700
  • Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
  • In-reply-to: <6583AD9F-3561-46C1-9B93-D2E79B1AFD10@dndrc.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <6583AD9F-3561-46C1-9B93-D2E79B1AFD10@dndrc.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac2gQgdDgYGooyOIQgqgE6pMMOt/mAAM+rjQ
  • Thread-topic: Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process on Uniformity of Contracts to Address Registration Abuse

Dear Zahid,

The motion has been posted on the motions page:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+October+2012

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Zahid Jamil [mailto:zahid@xxxxxxxxx] 
Envoyé : mardi 2 octobre 2012 04:01
Objet : Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process on Uniformity 
of Contracts to Address Registration Abuse 


Dear Glen,

I would like to propose the following motion for the Toronto meeting. Thanks:



"Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process on Uniformity of 
Contracts to Address Registration Abuse 



Whereas the Registration Abuse Policies Working Group (RAPWG) recommended in 
its Final Report 'the creation of an Issues Report to evaluate whether a 
minimum baseline of registration abuse provisions should be created for all 
in-scope ICANN agreements, and if created, how such language would be 
structured to address the most common forms of registration abuse';



Whereas the GNSO Council requested an Issue Report to evaluate whether a 
minimum baseline of registration abuse provisions should be created for all in 
scope ICANN agreements, and if created, how such language would be structured 
to address the most common forms of registration abuse on 6 October 2011;



Whereas ICANN Staff posted the Preliminary Issue Report on Uniformity of 
Contracts on 25 July 2012 for public comment (see 
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/uoc-prelim-issue-report-25jul12-en.htm);



Whereas ICANN Staff reviewed the comments received and updated the report 
accordingly;



Whereas the Final Issue Report on Uniformity of Contracts was published on 20 
September 2012;



Whereas, the Final Issue Report recommends that the GNSO Council proceed with a 
Policy Development Process limited to consideration of the issues discussed in 
this report, and the General Counsel of ICANN has indicated the topic is 
properly within the scope of the ICANN policy process and within the scope of 
the GNSO.

THEREFORE BE IT:

Resolved, the GNSO will initiate a PDP on the issues defined in the Final Issue 
Report on Uniformity of Contracts (link)

Resolved, a DT will be formed to create a charter for a Working Group, which 
will be submitted to the GNSO Council for its approval.

Resolved, following the approval of the charter, a Working Group will be 
created for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements of the PDP."



Best regards, 

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan

Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the 
intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute 
privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.

Sent from my iPad




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>