[council] Fwd: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Councillors, FYI.

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM NetNames France
----------------
Registry Relations and Strategy Director
NetNames
T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61


Début du message réexpédié :

> De : Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : RE: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion
> Date : 28 septembre 2012 18:08:48 HAEC
> À : 'Stéphane Van Gelder' (stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx) 
> <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc : Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx>, Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx>, 
> Amy Stathos <amy.stathos@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Dear Stéphane,
> Kurt forwarded me your kind reply to his mail below, and I would like to 
> follow-up with some updates and a specific question. As you may have noted, 
> the first upcoming sessions on URS are a webinar on 3 October 
> (seehttp://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-6-24sep12-en.htm 
> ) and a session in Toronto on 18 October (see 
> http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34325), where we will further discuss the 
> solution suggestions brought up by the community in Prague and pursue the 
> objectives stated in Kurt’s mail.  The ambition is to find an agreed way to 
> analyze each suggestion in detail and reach balanced conclusions, for example 
> by establishing a suitably balanced drafting team for that purpose.
>  
> Now to my question, as you mention that the Council may follow-up on Kurt’s 
> message in a near future: Could we count on a presentation or statement at 
> the URS session in Toronto to provide GNSO Council guidance on the best way 
> forward for the continued URS work?
>  
> I hope this is possible and look forward to your response.
>  
> On another note: I also intend to contact the GNSO SGs/Constituencies 
> individually as their contributions to the discussions in substance are 
> essential. In addition, your help in spreading the word to them would be much 
> appreciated. Proposals for the Toronto session as to speakers and topics are 
> warmly welcome, as well as written input.
>  
> Very best regards
>  
> Olof
>  
>  
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Kurt <kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion
>  
> Thanks Kurt. I am copying the Council for their information.
>  
> The Council will no doubt follow-up on this in the near future.
>  
> Best,
>  
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Directeur Général / General manager
> INDOM NetNames France
> ----------------
> Registry Relations and Strategy Director
> NetNames
> T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
> F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61
> 
>  
> Le 18 sept. 2012 à 22:09, Kurt Pritz a écrit :
> 
> 
> Hi Stephane:
>  
> I am writing to let you know that we are planning a set of discussions on 
> Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) implementation in the near future and seek the 
> input of GNSO leadership. As you know, a meeting in Prague we indicated that 
> URS, as currently designed, did not appear to meet cost requirements. In 
> Prague, contributors in the meeting described briefly several potential 
> solutions. In the next set of meetings, we want to flesh out some of those 
> models for possible implementation.We want to have one meeting in about two 
> weeks (probably a webinar type of format with a possibility for some 
> face-to-face interaction), and then we have a meeting in Toronto is 
> scheduled. The first meeting will be announced shortly.
>  
> I am writing you because some of the proposed solutions, while feasible, do 
> not match up with the specific conclusions of the STI team when it did its 
> work. We recognize the role of the GNSO in those discussions. While the 
> meetings we are having are open to all, we understand that the GNSO 
> leadership might want to conduct the URS discussions in a certain way. Having 
> the twin goals of developing a solution in time for use by new gTLDs and 
> ensuring that all those interested can participate in the discussion, we can 
> work in whichever way the GNSO wishes to proceed. (Of course, we also seek to 
> meet the cost and timeliness goals for which the the URS was designed and 
> also seek to ensure that registrants enjoy the protections written into the 
> current model by the IRT and STI.)The output of the next meetings can inform 
> GNSO discussion or we can carry on in a way acceptable to the GNSO.
>  
> I am also copying Olivier as ALAC members participated in the STI.
>  
> I hope you find this helpful. Contact me anytime with questions.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Kurt
>  
>  
>