RE: [council] Council meeting calendar

[carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I share the position of Jeff and is very important to take in account the 
ALAN`s words related to JAS WG situation. 

Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
former ALAC member by LACRALO
Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
http://ar.ageiadensi.org 


> From: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx; stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx; 
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:05:22 -0400
> Subject: RE: [council] Council meeting calendar
> 
> 
> I have shared my views with Stephane that I believe cancelling the meeting is 
> not a good idea.  We have 8+ motions at least to consider on the 22nd and 
> many of them are very substantive and likely may be deferred.
> 
> In addition, we vowed at the last open council meeting to try new things at 
> the Dakar public council meeting to make it more interactive and less focused 
> on motions drafting etc.  In order to be able to do that, we need to get some 
> business done before hand.  
> 
> Given all of the things we now have on our plate, Kristina's note that there 
> may be additional motions from the IPC, the substantive discussions we will 
> likely have with JAS, and everything above, I am not in favor of cancelling 
> the next meeting.
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 
> 
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:50 AM
> To: Stéphane Van Gelder; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx List
> Subject: Re: [council] Council meeting calendar
> 
> 
> Cancelling that meeting presumes that a decision 
> on the JAS report will not be deferred at the 
> Sept 22 meeting. If it were deferred, a vote 
> taken at the Oct 6 meeting would still be 
> effective (ie a decision of the GNSO prior to 
> Dakar, even if a day late for the official document cutoff).
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 14/09/2011 04:50 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> 
> >Councillors,
> >
> >As a side-effect of pushing back our September 
> >meeting to the 22nd, our meeting calendar for 
> >October now no longer seems to make much sense.
> >
> >We have 2 meetings planned in October, the first 
> >on Oct 6 and the second is the Open Meeting in Dakar on Oct 26.
> >
> >The first meeting has a deadline for motions on 
> >Sept 28, so that's just days after our Sept 22 meeting.
> >
> >In light of all this, I would like to suggest we 
> >simply cancel the meeting planned on Oct 6 and 
> >return to our standard one-month interval 
> >between meetings with our Open Meeting on Oct 26.
> >
> >This would also have the added benefit of making 
> >the Oct 26 meeting more relevant. You will 
> >remember that in Singapore, we suffered a little 
> >in drafting the agenda for our Open Meeting 
> >there because we'd had a Council teleconference 
> >just days before the Singapore meeting.
> >
> >Does anyone object to canceling the Oct 6 meting?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Stéphane
> 
> 
>