RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agree.

Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
> From: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 4:05 am
> To: 
> Cc: "'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Unfortunately, that brings us back to the discussion we had after whatever 
> meeting it was, when we ended up re-drafting motions during our public 
> meeting, and that didn't go down well either - both seem opposite ends of the 
> spectrum (too much open discussion versus too little?). Maybe we should 
> discuss this during the wrap-up session tomorrow.
>  
> Cheers
> Mary
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
> http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: 
> "Neuman, Jeff" 
> 
> To:
> "'tim@xxxxxxxxxxx'" , "'adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" 
> 
> CC:
> "'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" 
> 
> Date: 
> 6/22/2011 4:59 AM
> 
> Subject: 
> Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"I think both Mikey 
> and subsequently jumped the gun based on the debates over the weekend, which 
> were just that....debates.
> 
> To post an article like Kieren has could have the unintended affect of 
> stifling open debate during our sessions. I for one prefer open debate, but 
> not if some are going to take that out of context.
> 
> We eventually got to the right place, but we needed to get there through 
> debate and working through the issues. We should have been given the benefit 
> of the doubt until we took final action.
> 
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Vice President, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
>  
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 04:46 AM
> To: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Subject: RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
>  
> 
> Of course, it is a one sided story. The Council changed nothing in the
> report or recommendations. It only changed it's own motion. But, we all
> know that. Too bad Kieren didn't bother to get more facts before jumping
> the gun with his article. He used to be a bit more careful.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
> > From: Adrian Kinderis 
> > Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 2:54 am
> > To: GNSO Council List 
> > 
> > http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model
> > 
> > Adrian Kinderis
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>