<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Final Working Group Work Team Report & Motion
Thanks Jeff.
So how about this as the full additional Resolve:
RESOLVED FURTHER that the GNSO Council recommends that a concise summary of the
WG Guidelines be drafted by ICANN Staff, following approval of the GNSO Working
Guidelines by the GNSO Council, in order to serve as a primer to the full
document for potential WG members. The one-page summary should be approved by
the PPSC before being submitted to the GNSO Council.
Stéphane
Le 11 janv. 2011 à 16:18, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
> I believe that this would be friendly if we can remove the word "one-page"
> and replace with something like "short and concise.". Totally understand and
> agree with the concept, but the words "one-page" may be too limiting. If you
> can accept that, I will gladly accept the rest as friendly.
>
> Thanks.
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Vice President, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 09:58 AM
> To: Neuman, Jeff
> Cc: 'GNSO Council' <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [council] Final Working Group Work Team Report & Motion
>
> Thanks Jeff.
>
> That being the case, I would like to propose an amendment to your motion.
>
> I would propose that a 3rd resolved clause be added stating the following:
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER that the GNSO Council recommends that a one-page summary of
> the WG Guidelines be drafted by ICANN Staff in order to serve as a primer to
> the full document for potential WG members. The one-page summary should be
> approved by the PPSC before being submitted to the GNSO Council.
>
> I hope you can consider this amendment friendly.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
> Le 10 janv. 2011 à 17:32, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
>
>> Stephane,
>>
>> I think you have some good points and I completely understand the notion of
>> having too much to read for what seems like fairly simple concepts. The
>> PPSC did not discuss this issue and I am not sure to what extent the WG-WT
>> discussed.
>>
>> However, I believe that once the principles are approved by the Council,
>> that we (the Council) can direct the staff to draft up a shorter summary
>> (with encouragement to read the full report). I suppose the PPSC could
>> review the summary to make sure it is in line with the final report. We
>> could also when it comes time to approve the principles in our motion direct
>> that staff hold a short session at the start of every Working Group to
>> educate Working Group members on the basics for those interested.
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>>
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
>> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
>> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
>> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
>> delete the original message.
>>
>>
>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 10:17 AM
>> To: Neuman, Jeff
>> Cc: 'GNSO Council'
>> Subject: Re: [council] Final Working Group Work Team Report & Motion
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Because these WG guidelines are intended for use by WG members (see 1.3) I
>> find it surprising that they would be expected to read a 35 page document in
>> order to get a grasp on the way ICANN recommends they should set-up and run
>> their WG.
>>
>> I do not find it realistic to expect volunteer members of a WG, not all of
>> which would necessarily be very clued on up ICANN processes (nor should we
>> expect them to be if we are to encourage broader community participation),
>> to have to tackle such a report. As such, I fear that what we will end up
>> seeing happening is that people do not read these guidelines and do not
>> profit from them.
>>
>> With regards to this, has the idea of producing a one-page summary of the
>> guidelines been discussed by the PPSC at all? The idea would be to have some
>> kind of WG guideline "primer" which could help people understand what is
>> expected of them as part of a GNSO WG.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stéphane
>>
>> Le 2 janv. 2011 à 03:53, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Please find enclosed the Final Working Group Work Team report as approved by
>> the Policy Process Steering Committee. I am also attaching for the
>> Council’s review a redline of the report that compares the Final to the
>> Interim Report that came out prior to the Brussels meeting. The changes
>> reflect public comments to the Interim report plus changes made as a result
>> of questions raised by the PPSC as addressed by the Working Group Work Team.
>> All of the constituencies/Stakeholder Groups represented on the PPSC
>> approved the final report with the exception of the Business Constituency,
>> who did not vote. The ALAC representative, who does not officially get a
>> vote, also expressed his approval of the report.
>>
>> A non-official informal poll was taken within the PPSC as to whether we
>> should recommend to the Council that it put the final report out for public
>> comment before review/approval given the changes that have been made since
>> the last time the report was out for comment. The Registries, IPC and ISP
>> representatives believe the GNSO Council should place the report out for
>> comment; the Registrars did not think it was necessary, but did not object;
>> the BC did not vote; and the NCSG opposed making this recommendation to the
>> Council (believing that the Council should decide for itself what it wanted
>> to do).
>>
>> The motion I present below acknowledges receipt of report and requests that
>> the report go out for comment (should the council elect to put it out for
>> comment).
>>
>> I would be happy to answer any questions.
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> Motion to Acknowledge the Receipt of the GNSO Working Group Guidelines and
>> Initiate a Public Comment Period
>>
>> WHEREAS, in October 2008, the GNSO Council established a framework (see GNSO
>> Council Improvements Implementation Plan;
>> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-implementation-plan-16oct08.pdf)
>> for implementing the various GNSO Improvements identified and approved by
>> the ICANN Board of Directors on 26 June 2008
>> (http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm#_Toc76113182
>> <http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm>);
>>
>> WHEREAS, that framework included the formation, in January 2009, of two
>> Steering Committees, the Operations Steering Committee (OSC) and thePolicy
>> Process Steering Committee (PPSC), to charter and coordinate the efforts of
>> five community work teams in developing specific recommendations to
>> implement the improvements;
>>
>> WHEREAS, the PPSC established two work teams, including the Working Group
>> Work Team (WG WT), which was chartered to develop a new GNSO Working Group
>> Model that improves inclusiveness, improves effectiveness, and improves
>> efficiency;
>>
>> WHEREAS, the WG WT completed its deliberations and forwarded the GNSO
>> Working Group Guidelines to the PPSC on 1 November 2010;
>>
>> WHEREAS, the PPSC reviewed and approved the GNSO Working Group Guidelines on
>> 20 December 2010 [includelink to GNSO Working Group Guidelines once posted]
>> and forwarded the report to the GNSO Council on 30 December 2010;
>>
>> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
>>
>> RESOLVED that the GNSO Council acknowledges receipt of the GNSO Working
>> Group Guidelines as delivered by the PPSC and directs ICANN Staff to
>> commence a twenty-one (21) day public comment period on the GNSO Working
>> Group Guidelines.
>>
>> RESOLVED FURTHER that the GNSO Council shall take action on the GNSO Working
>> Group Guidelines as soon as possible after the end of the public comment
>> period.
>>
>>
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>> 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
>> Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
>> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
>> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
>> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
>> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
>> delete the original message.
>>
>> <GNSO WG Guidelines - FINAL - 10 December
>> 2010.pdf><GNSO_WG_Guideline_Revised_Final_Redline_10 December 2010.doc>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|