Re: [council] Future GNSO Activity? Re - .job Reconsideration Request

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Rosemary,

Thanks for offering to take the lead on this. I think that would be most 
helpful.

Would anyone else like to volunteer to work with Rosemary on this?

Stéphane

Le 12 déc. 2010 à 17:59, rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :

> Hi Stephane
> 
> I hosted a workshop in Catragena on Consumer Choice and Trust as per AoC
> 
> This topic came up as one of our discussion points
> 
> I'd be happy to take responsibilty for progressing this work in GNSO and with 
> the other groups if that would be of assistance
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Rosemary
> Sent from my BlackBerry® from Optus
> 
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 03:45:51 +1100
> To: Neuman, Jeff<Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: 'GNSO Council'<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [council] Future GNSO Activity? Re - .job Reconsideration Request
> 
> Thanks Jeff.
> 
> I am working on the agenda for our next Council meeting and the two Cartagena 
> Board resolutions that referenced the GNSO will be included in that agenda as 
> discussion items.
> 
> There's res8, as you mention, and res6, where the Board is asking that 
> Resolved (2010.12.10.30), the ICANN Board requests advice from the ALAC, GAC, 
> GNSO and ccNSO on establishing the definition, measures, and three year 
> targets for those measures, for competition, consumer trust and consumer 
> choice in the context of the domain name system, such advice to be provided 
> for discussion at the ICANN International Public meeting in San Francisco 
> from 13-18 March 2010.
> 
> There's actually very little time for us to start working on this and be 
> ready by SF.
> 
> As people wind down from the Cartagena meeting, it's possibly not the best 
> time to start looking at these two action items right now. But I will be 
> asking the Council to do so in the upcoming weeks and, as mentioned, I would 
> then like us to discuss during our Jan 13 meeting.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> Le 12 déc. 2010 à 16:12, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
> 
>> FYI, saw this resolution passed on the reconsideration request for a 
>> registry service by .jobs.   Although the reconsideration request was 
>> denied, there is a reference in the BGC recommendation that asks the GNSO to 
>> consider a process to evaluate amendments that may have the effect of 
>> changing, or seeking to change, an sTLD Charter or stated purpose of a 
>> sponsored, restricted or community-based TLD.
>> 
>> The BGC report can be found at:  
>> http://www.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-09dec10-en.pdf.
>>   The Resolution is below:
>>  
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1.     Response to Reconsideration Request 10-2
>> 
>> Whereas, the BGC has reviewed and considered Reconsideration Request 10-2 
>> submitted by the .JOBS Charter Compliance Coalition on 20 August 2010 
>> (supplemented as posted at 
>> <http://www.icann.org/en/committees/board-governance/requests-for-reconsideration-en.htm>)
>>  concerning the Board's 5 August 2010 resolution approving Employ Media’s 
>> .JOBS Phased Allocation Program.
>> 
>> Whereas, the BGC recommended that the Request be denied as unsupported 
>> because: (i) the Coalition’s concerns regarding potential violations of the 
>> Charter in the implementation of the Phased Allocation Program is not a 
>> proper ground for reconsidering the Board’s 5 August 2010 Action; and (ii) 
>> the Board did not fail to consider material information available at the 
>> time of the Action.
>> 
>> Whereas, the BGC recommended that the Board direct the President and CEO, 
>> and General Counsel and Secretary, to ensure that ICANN’s Contractual 
>> Compliance Department closely monitor Employ Media’s compliance with its 
>> Charter.
>> 
>> Whereas, the BGC recommended that the Board direct the CEO to create a 
>> briefing paper for the GNSO to consider on this matter, and for the GNSO to 
>> determine whether a policy development process should be commenced.
>> 
>> Whereas, the Reconsideration Request and the BGC's Recommendation has been 
>> posted on the ICANN website 
>> <http://www.icann.org/en/committees/board-governance/requests-for-reconsideration-en.htm>.
>> 
>> Resolved (2010.12.10.35), the Board adopts the Recommendation of the BGC on 
>> Reconsideration Request 10-2.
>> 
>>  
>>  
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>> 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
>> Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
>> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  / www.neustar.biz     
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
>> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
>> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
>> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and 
>> delete the original message.
>>  
>