ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Cartagena schedule update, Saturday Dec 4

  • To: "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Cartagena schedule update, Saturday Dec 4
  • From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:52:49 +0000
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <8C5605D0-EDAD-43C5-B647-DA0D93F02A9B@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <8C5605D0-EDAD-43C5-B647-DA0D93F02A9B@indom.com>
  • Reply-to: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sensitivity: Normal

No doubt this will include a review of the explanatory memo on this topic as 
well, right? It explains a lot and is why I believe an endorsement of rec 6 is 
not appropriate at this point and would only encourage further delays.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:12:16 
To: GNSO Council<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Cartagena schedule update, Saturday Dec 4

Hi all,

Please note that we have updated our weekend schedule to reflect a presentation 
that Margie has volunteered to make to the Council on Rec6.

This will be part of our lunchtime session, from 13 to 14:00.

Margie has forwarded the following agenda for her presentation:

1.       Overview of the CWG Rec6 Report Recommendations
2.       Overview of Recent Events including Board Resolutions, Final Proposed 
Applicant Guidebook treatment, and CWG  Consultation
3.       Discussion of Motion to Endorse
4.       Q&A

Thanks,

Stéphane


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>