Re: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS

[William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

On SOIs in 5.3.3---Do you have any type of commercial or non-commercial 
interest in ICANN GNSO policy development processes and outcomes? Please answer 
“yes” or “no.”—could someone remind me how exactly we're defining a 
non-commercial interest?  It's good that the unworkable language on intangible 
benefits has been deleted but I'd just like to be sure what needs to be 
declared under the language that remains…

Thanks,

Bill

On Nov 16, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

> Hi,  I am unclear whether these revisions were reviewed and approved by the 
> OSC?  If so, that should be stated clearly in the motion, that the 
> deliverables are from OSC rather than any work team underneath that Steering 
> Committee.  If not, then OSC needs to approve them and send to us.  Please 
> help to clarify this.
>  
> Thanks,
> Mike
>  
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
> http://rodenbaugh.com
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:39 AM
> To: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; ray@xxxxxxxxx; stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES 
> WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
>  
> Colleagues,
> 
> The first "Resolved" of the a.m. motion (see 
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions) reads:
> 
>         RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted 
> by the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the 
> aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment 
> Forum.
> 
> I wonder whether the GCOT has submitted and the OSC has approved the proposed 
> revisions to section 5.0 in the version presented. To my knowledge the OSC 
> approval was given including  the DOI. In this case I'd like to suggest a 
> friendly amendment as follows:
> 
>         RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted 
> by the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the 
> aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment Forum
> 
> Philp's and Ray's advise would be helpful.
> 
> There are still references to DOI left in the revision which I've removed 
> (see attached).
> 
>  
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
> 
> <<GNSO Operating Procedures v2 Section 5 Proposed Revisions without DOI 15 
> Oct 2010 redline (WUK_edit).doc>>
> 

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.williamdrake.org
***********************************************************