ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] RE: Adding incoming Councilors to the Council list

  • To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] RE: Adding incoming Councilors to the Council list
  • From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:22:36 +0900
  • Cc: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5HX4TfYAiEmtusn84zlIPSHVRLcZcbNYZkIWzTACH4I=; b=cn4g8+timTQ69qZvcNF82rQwxgq0YjQA7P9E927hYzLqAokyZ6qJCoZggtjE9wNMHK GSxKNmmBhmbq/2MzSN5SzK9pKbRMe3fk6uAGu8h0fYHZV61M4IzHUmUN9NAsUxyJVt6p TUxsDfRhF9v34H6eTvfEu6WYnvEZdDRDL127E=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=xe8/IhoV63fxVyW64Hs2CU8sqQGJyfze/o1LZIaj8Mj7Qu6ZF7pjrEk+Ntz37mjckl HMzy/x9/7G7eQlpIL8LrBQX9fyXvn39m4kRNSWfvmYTVdYtFJWW6yYELLLFksEXkX5/T oW4x015Mt3TQNjZVWSGzf1U2jru+hp5PgspBc=
  • In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F6DB@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07037ABCFF@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F544@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07037ABD23@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F5C1@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07037ABD26@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F5C7@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <AANLkTikou3CMLk-udb11wO1Yiah0SbMYfY08Kz-7yLSc@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F6DB@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> It therefore seems silly, to me at least, to have to create another avenue
> for this ‘reason’.
>

I think that there is indeed silliness but I tend to think that you are
mistaking from which side it is ;).

>
>
> If there is another reason I am happy to hear it.
>

mmm, maybe showing good will to cooperate with new councilor?

>
>
> Apart from that I continue to object.
>
>
>
> That said, this is such a minuscule issue. If it causes headaches feel free
> to move on and create more work for someone.
>

indeed, it is minuscule, in fact it is not an issue at all. Glen can grant
permissions easily without significant workload, but dear colleague, you
replied to thread  5 times (and I can presumably expect another reply), even
from you iphone, you are undoubtedly autonomous and self-fulfilling in term
of workload :)

Rafik
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>