AW: [council] Planning for Brussels

[<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

 I agree, house meeting is up to the SGs to prepare.

Saturday night dinner: yes

Sunday morning breakfast: yes


Regards
Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. April 2010 16:45
An: William Drake; Stéphane Van Gelder
Cc: GNSO Council
Betreff: RE: [council] Planning for Brussels


Regarding Bill's request for advanced planning of the NCP House meeting, that 
is not something than Glen and Stephane have much influence over so I suggest 
that the NCSG and CSG Councilors work with your respective SG leadership teams 
and Constituency leadership teams as applicable to start that planning right 
away if it has not already begun.  It would be very helpful for planning 
purposes if that planning was far enough along by the end of April to be able 
to at least firm up the schedule.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of William Drake
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 3:13 AM
> To: Stéphane Van Gelder
> Cc: GNSO Council
> Subject: Re: [council] Planning for Brussels
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:41 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Councillors,
> > 
> > Glen and I are already working on the GNSO agenda for 
> Brussels and one of the items we need to sort out pretty 
> quickly is whether the Council wants to have an informal 
> dinner on the first Saturday evening like we did first in 
> Seoul, then in Nairobi.
> 
> Yes
> > 
> > Also, do people want to have the Sunday morning breakfast 
> again as well?
> 
> I haven't seen the value added so far and detest breakfast 
> meetings, particularly when they're not in the hotel
> > 
> > We also need to know if both houses wish to have separate 
> meetings on the Saturday morning (reminder: due to the low 
> numbers from the CP house in Nairobi, only the NCP house had 
> a meeting)?
> 
> I would favor this providing there is advanced planning of 
> the agenda and agreement on how the meeting will be run.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
>