ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
  • From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:33:29 +0900
  • Cc: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gdaQk9R4yJD61318ZtV4OwquhOFavHlZ3Yew8GoId50=; b=BvHhNWxJa74c5e+WHxlS/GLENRL56R7sGUzp0ZlAaK6ka2PCPeJ/FSvmHA3a3phpwu 4g4TD8Q6OVwANSfWBkmcnDucVK0Hwa2vrHpnr+QtfQ/eCNL3Jzh94L7xL041yAwVezAt XRBBTEgFovhuxxNHAAAFGnD1PKQmBdnbWUjdI=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=jXxVYo10ZqbW10EFcF4TfLVKMWS7jYouOwiI1baSZDFvvBmX8q5RENB6AwC7v89JK3 RqH6KJPoGbxiskey+uLo2+dKwWqmBaN+Gha3QFXlppUDXr0vadlxxvY79ShbNzy6Nya6 RwP/K3z2pYv4vXwhTuQ754/Z836eCtCpinKWE=
  • In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07032734DC@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <20100329131941.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.4cd306b996.wbe@email.secureserver.net> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07032734DC@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,

unfortunately, I cannot see it as friendly amendment.

Regards

Rafik

2010/3/30 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Rafik/Olga,
>
> Do you accept this as a friendly amendment?
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:20 PM
> > To: GNSO Council
> > Subject: RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING
> > GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
> >
> >
> > Since it seems to be agreed that what is intended is to look
> > for funding opportunities outside of ICANN's own budget to
> > possibly resolve this concern, I would like to make that
> > evident in the motion and propose this friendly amendment:
> >
> > Add the following to the first Resolve:
> >
> > keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to recover the costs of
> > new gTLD applications and on-going services to new gTLDs
> >
> > So the first Resolve would read:
> >
> > Resolved, that the GNSO Council supports the formation of a
> > joint SO/AC working group to respond to the Board's request
> > by developing a sustainable approach to providing support to
> > new gTLD applicants requiring assistance in applying for and
> > operating new gTLDS, keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to
> > recover the costs of new gTLD applications and on-going
> > services to new gTLDs;
> >
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP
> > ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
> > From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, March 24, 2010 9:43 am
> > To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO
> > <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I want to submit motion to approve joint SO/AC council
> > working group on new gTLD applicant support the motion
> > document is attached.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Rafik
> >
> >
> >
>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>