RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rafik/Olga,

Do you accept this as a friendly amendment?

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:20 PM
> To: GNSO Council 
> Subject: RE: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING 
> GROUP ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
> 
> 
> Since it seems to be agreed that what is intended is to look 
> for funding opportunities outside of ICANN's own budget to 
> possibly resolve this concern, I would like to make that 
> evident in the motion and propose this friendly amendment:
> 
> Add the following to the first Resolve:
> 
> keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to recover the costs of 
> new gTLD applications and on-going services to new gTLDs
> 
> So the first Resolve would read:
> 
> Resolved, that the GNSO Council supports the formation of a 
> joint SO/AC working group to respond to the Board's request 
> by developing a sustainable approach to providing support to 
> new gTLD applicants requiring assistance in applying for and 
> operating new gTLDS, keeping in mind ICANN's requirement to 
> recover the costs of new gTLD applications and on-going 
> services to new gTLDs;
> 
> 
> Tim 
> 
>  
>  
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] MOTION TO CREATE JOINT SO/AC WORKING GROUP 
> ON NEW GTLD APPLICANT SUPPORT
> From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, March 24, 2010 9:43 am
> To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO 
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I want to submit motion to approve joint SO/AC council 
> working group on new gTLD applicant support the motion 
> document is attached.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 
>