ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR



Bill, there is a line in the draft which says "We agree with the draft that Review team members are not to "represent" particularistic interests, and that they should be broadly neutral and focused on the collective good of the ICANN community as a whole."

Can you point out where the document it says this? I can find a bunch of references saying that the do represent the AC/SOs, but not the opposite.

Alan


At 19/01/2010 10:40 AM, William Drake wrote:
Hello,

Attached please find the drafting team's proposed response to the draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements and Implementation Processes, for discussion with our respective SGs and in the Council.

Best,

Bill




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>