Re: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council
Please add Jean Christophe Vignes and Jon Nevett from the RrSG. Stéphane Le 21/10/09 12:02, « Stéphane Van Gelder » <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > Hi, > > On behalf of the RrSG, please add myself, Adrian Kinderis and RrSG Treasurer > Jeff Eckhaus to this list. > > Stéphane > > > Le 18/10/09 14:46, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit : > >> >> >> On 15 Oct 2009, at 14:23, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote: >> >>> If we do decide to go for a DT, >> >> I think this is a good idea as a way to start and fits patterns that >> have proven successful in taking the first steps in recent efforts. >> >> I do not want to wipe the weekend end schedule for this, however, as >> we have a published agenda for the weekend and have people committed >> to those tasks who are planing to come to Seoul in time or those >> meetings. >> >> This does not minimize the importance of starting on the Board letter >> on Specific Trademark Issues (STI) and DAGv3 and that is why I think >> the suggestion about forming a DT a good idea. Because of the press >> of time, we cannot wait for a meeting to do this. So I am suggesting >> we start now. >> >> I propose forming a DT composed of participants each SG and the active >> Liaison groups who are willing to focus their time next week (perhaps >> even finding time for a teleconference) and on the weekend to come up >> with a plan and start the work for the council to discuss/accept at >> the Wednesday open meeting and at the Thursday meeting. >> >> Unless there is strong objection from the members of the council, I >> ask each SG to name 2-3 members and the active ACSO liaison groups to >> name 1 representative each for the STI-DT and ask Glen (or some >> member of staff who is not traveling at the moment) to set up a >> mailing list, with open archive, for that team immediately. I think >> it is a good suggestion for those SGs that have members who were on >> the IRT as either members or observers to consider including them >> among the 2-3 volunteers. I think the SGs should find people in the >> SG, not necessarily council members to populate these meeting - and >> recommend that the people doing this find alternatives to replace (at >> least temporarily) them in other other ongoing ICANN tasks (except of >> course for council membership). >> >> We do have some unused meting room space on Saturday (11am on), so I >> suggest we schedule this group consider an open meeting during this >> opne time. >> >> The topic has already been scheduled for the Wednesday open meeting >> (https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_28_oct_2009 >> ), and has already been spoken of as the main topic for the Thursday >> meeting (https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi? >> agenda_29_oct_2009). >> >> a. >> >> Attachment:
smime.p7s
|