Re: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council
Hi, On behalf of the RrSG, please add myself, Adrian Kinderis and RrSG Treasurer Jeff Eckhaus to this list. Stéphane Le 18/10/09 14:46, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > On 15 Oct 2009, at 14:23, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote: > >> If we do decide to go for a DT, > > I think this is a good idea as a way to start and fits patterns that > have proven successful in taking the first steps in recent efforts. > > I do not want to wipe the weekend end schedule for this, however, as > we have a published agenda for the weekend and have people committed > to those tasks who are planing to come to Seoul in time or those > meetings. > > This does not minimize the importance of starting on the Board letter > on Specific Trademark Issues (STI) and DAGv3 and that is why I think > the suggestion about forming a DT a good idea. Because of the press > of time, we cannot wait for a meeting to do this. So I am suggesting > we start now. > > I propose forming a DT composed of participants each SG and the active > Liaison groups who are willing to focus their time next week (perhaps > even finding time for a teleconference) and on the weekend to come up > with a plan and start the work for the council to discuss/accept at > the Wednesday open meeting and at the Thursday meeting. > > Unless there is strong objection from the members of the council, I > ask each SG to name 2-3 members and the active ACSO liaison groups to > name 1 representative each for the STI-DT and ask Glen (or some > member of staff who is not traveling at the moment) to set up a > mailing list, with open archive, for that team immediately. I think > it is a good suggestion for those SGs that have members who were on > the IRT as either members or observers to consider including them > among the 2-3 volunteers. I think the SGs should find people in the > SG, not necessarily council members to populate these meeting - and > recommend that the people doing this find alternatives to replace (at > least temporarily) them in other other ongoing ICANN tasks (except of > course for council membership). > > We do have some unused meting room space on Saturday (11am on), so I > suggest we schedule this group consider an open meeting during this > opne time. > > The topic has already been scheduled for the Wednesday open meeting > (https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_28_oct_2009 > ), and has already been spoken of as the main topic for the Thursday > meeting (https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi? > agenda_29_oct_2009). > > a. > > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|