<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Re: Board Resolution on individual users
- To: avri@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [council] Re: Board Resolution on individual users
- From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:44:56 +0100
- Cc: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <cheryl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Janis Karklins <janis.karklins@xxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1232448345.8870.45.camel@bower>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <aafc0f850901192120g683cb1acrd2f13cad8d11e68c@mail.gmail.com> <1232448345.8870.45.camel@bower>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Avri,
Just one small distinction---noncommercial stakeholders, not
necessarily NCUC.
Cheers,
Bill
On Jan 20, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
We have heard from the NCUC chair, council reps and others that the
only
appropriate interested GNSO parties are from the NCUC. I would like
to
hear from some of the rest of the councilors to determine what path we
should take.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|