RE: [council] Re: Board Resolution on individual users

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Unless someone else wants to do it, I will draft such a motion and
submit & post it NLT tomorrow.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:14 AM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: RE: [council] Re: Board Resolution on individual users
> 
> 
> (note, i have removed the cc list)
> 
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:19 -0500, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > As Denise pointed out, the Working Group on GNSO Council 
> Restructuring 
> > (WG-GCR), which consisted of representatives of each 
> constituency and 
> > the ALAC as well as a NomCom appointee, recommended to the 
> Board that 
> > the composition of the non-contracted party voting house of 
> the GNSO 
> > Council should "...be open to membership of all interested 
> parties ...
> > that use or provide services for the Internet, ... and should 
> > explicitly not be restricted to domain registrants as 
> recommended by 
> > the BGC."
> > So
> > it might be useful as a first step to simply confirm that we still 
> > support this recommendation.  I wouldn't think that this 
> step should 
> > require any special working group or drafting team.  Do any 
> > constituencies or NomCom appointees disagree with this 
> recommendation?
> 
> I think this is a reasonable step, though I would recommend 
> that we take a vote on it that can show what level of support 
> there is in the council, after council members have consulted 
> their constituencies as appropriate.
> 
> I would like to see a motion on this for next week's meeting.
> 
> thanks
> 
> a.
> 
>