RE: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO public forum

["Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'll volunteer to work with Philip and Ross and anyone else who volunteers
-- Avri? -- to draft a resolution on the litigation/.com settlement proposed
agreement for Council. This p.m. I'll be in IDN workshop. Can we "gather"
then and do a draft to circulate later? 

Marilyn 

-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:30 PM
To: Marilyn Cade
Cc: GNSO Council; Bruce Tonkin
Subject: Re: [council] Draft Agenda for GNSO public forum

Hi,

I think both of these are really good topics.
On 29 nov 2005, at 17.29, Marilyn Cade wrote:

> Bruce, I have two additions. One is the .com/litigation topic,  
> which deserves time on our agenda. I also note to the Council that  
> I recommend that the Council table a resolution on this topic for  
> the Council meeting itself.

On this I have been surprised that we have not tackled this yet.  And  
do suggest that there should be a formal council position since this  
definitely has policy implications.

>
> Secondly. If you recall, I asked to invite Janis Karklins,  
> president of WSIS prepatory process, and Ambassador from Latvia, to  
> discuss the outcomes of WSIS with the Council. Can we offer  
> Ambassador Karklins a set 30 min time slot for a dialogue with the  
> Council in our public forum? Am. Karklins has accepted and we need  
> to give him a time for the participation. We could certainly put  
> this segment at the end of the two hour segment, and take some time  
> from the formal Council agenda.
>

I wonder whether we can't also invite Marcus as the passt Secretariat  
of WGIG to attend this meeting as well.

> Can you let me know what time might work for Am. Karklins?

I would think that we should allot at least 30 minutes to this.

thanks
a.