<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: Reminder: 17/18 May "Approval process for registry changes pdp" teleconference
- To: <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] RE: Reminder: 17/18 May "Approval process for registry changes pdp" teleconference
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 09:46:47 +0200
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <NNEDIOPEMBHEFLDDKOMJOEBPDHAA.gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcQ71mn2lrwtCW3LTVS8mC5b44UtawADCggg
I am unlikely to be able to make this call. I give my proxy to Grant then
Marilyn.
I can say however that I am overall broadly in favour of the flow charts
presented in the last version.
Guiding principles for any further change (if proposed) should be:
- is there an existing ICANN process that we can use here rather than
inventing a new one?
- is the process simple and easy to understand?
- is there the right balance between consultation and speed / simplicity?
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|