Tim, Thomas, Jordyn,
In order to cure team 2's "laggard" status, would it be possible for
us to
convene by conference call on Wednesday April 7 at 10:30 am EDT?
Steve Metalitz
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:16 PM
To: 'Thomas Roessler'
Cc: tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [tf2-sg2] Proxy services overview
Thanks Tom. I'll contact them yet this evening and try to have
something for
you by tomorrow.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 4:54 PM
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tf2-sg2] Proxy services overview
On 2004-03-29 16:10:35 -0600, Tim Ruiz wrote:
At the very least, remove the paragraph that starts with "There
is anecdotal evidence about Go Daddy's practices from the
re-code.com incident..." and the associated links (including
Wendy's blog link) UNLESS you make a specific attempt to contact
Domains by Proxy, Inc. to respond AND include that response,
whatever it is, in full in this report.
Referencing one side and including the other side's response
verbatim isn't precisely balanced... I'd suggest we move the
incident outside the actual table, with language like this:
There is little anecdotal evidence available on actual
experiences made with proxy and similar services. One
incident which has received some attention is the
<a>re-code.com</a> incident. The domain name had been
registered using Domains By Proxy; pseudonymity of the
registrant was lifted upon receipt of a <a>cease and desist
letter</a> from Wal-Mart. <a>Discussion in Wendy Seltzer's
web log</a>; <a>discussion on nettime-l</a>; <a>response
from Domains By Proxy</a>.
"response from Domains By Proxy" would be a link to a statement from
domains by proxy. (If the statement of the basic facts isn't
accurate, then that can and should of course be fixed in the main
document.)
BTW, it is DBP practices you are referring to here, not Go
Daddy's.
Noted. Apologies.
It is DBP's response that you need if you are going to insist on
including the referenced incident.
Can I leave it to you to quickly get that response?
Thanks,
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/