RE: [tf2-sg2] Proxy services overview

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

At the very least, remove the paragraph that starts with "There is anecdotal
evidence about Go Daddy's practices from the re-code.com incident..." and
the associated links (including Wendy's blog link) UNLESS you make a
specific attempt to contact Domains by Proxy, Inc. to respond AND include
that response, whatever it is, in full in this report.

BTW, it is DBP practices you are referring to here, not Go Daddy's. It is
DBP's response that you need if you are going to insist on including the
referenced incident.

I am not concerned about the constituency responses to the surveys. They are
what they are and should be included.

Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:59 PM
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tf2-sg2] Proxy services overview

On 2004-03-29 14:19:53 -0600, Tim Ruiz wrote:

> I find the information regarding proxy services included in this
> document as very one-sided and incomplete.

I'd appreciate any specific requests for changes or additions. After
all, this is supposed to be the work product of this entire team.
Concerning your questions about a survey, there was a specific
question in the survey of individual registrars; you were the only
one who responded to that one.

PS: An early document that had all the same links (except, I
believe, the ones to the constituency statements) was circulated to
this group in late February.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/