Re: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?

[Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, that's what I was looking for.

I note, though, that there was no feed-back to my earlier suggestion
to set up a conference call for this sub-group.  If members are
currently unable to make the necessary time commitments, I'd suggest
that we get back to the entire task force with these news and try to
draft some more support.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/






On 2004-03-17 09:36:20 +0100, GNSO Secretariat wrote:
> From: GNSO SECRETARIAT <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:36:20 +0100
> Subject: RE: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?
> Reply-To: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-Spam-Level: 
> 
> Could it be this:
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow2tf/msg00076.html
> see also
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/raa-whois-16dec03.shtml
> 
> GNSO Secretariat
> 
>  mardi 16 mars 2004 11:28 Thomas Roessler a ecrit
> Hello,
> 
> we should probably spend some time on figuring out what we report
> back to the task force and the ICANN community at large on current
> practice with respect to WHOIS.  I'd suggest we schedule a
> conference call for some day later this week.
> 
> We will have to look at the material that we received pre Rome, and
> the staff's report on registrars' current practice in implementing
> policies related to notification of and consent by registrants.
> (Glen, Barbara: Where's that report, again? I have the feeling that
> I've received a copy some time ago, but have lost it.) Also, there's
> a response from .pl directly to Task Force 3, and the CENTR survey
> at <http://www.centr.org/meetings/ga-21/WHOIS-paper-v1.0.pdf>; see
> also
> <http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow3tf/msg00112.html>.
> 
> 
>