<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[tf2-sg2] DRAFT: Summary of Information Received on Current Practice
- To: tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [tf2-sg2] DRAFT: Summary of Information Received on Current Practice
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:34:15 +0100
- Sender: owner-tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Hello,
I'm attaching a draft summary of the information we have gathered so
far. The bulk of this document is based on an evening of Google
searches for proxy registration providers, and on comments I
received in response to a blog item; see
<http://log.does-not-exist.org/archives/2004/02/24/1371_proxy_registration_providers.html>.
Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
Title: WHOIS -- Current Practice
WHOIS: Current Practice
Thomas Roessler
<roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 2004-02-26
Data elements
An overview chart of the data elements presented by registrars and
registries can be found on
the ICANN web site.
Registrar and ccTLD Survey
WHOIS Task Force #2 circulated a surveys among registrars
and ccTLD
operators. Feed-back was received from Deutsche
Telekom, Go
Daddy and affiliated firms, and from Global
Name Registry (the latter in response to the questions asked to
ccTLD operators). To date, no responses were received from ccTLD
operators.
Additionally, ICANN staff was asked to test-drive some registrars'
registration procedures to assess how registrants are actually informed
of the data collected and disclosed, and asked for their consent to the
collection and disclosure of their data. The part of the questionnaire
that relates to these questions will be discussed separately.
Both Go Daddy and Deutsche Telekom make the full WHOIS data required
by the registrar
accreditation agreement available. Deutsche Telekom had implemented
three privacy levels for contact data, but deactivated this feature
upon complaints. Go Daddy has a sister firm, Domains by Proxy, that
provides fr domain name registrations that do not require disclosure of
registrant details in WHOIS services; see below. In terms of specific
accommodations to local law, Go Daddy had to make none, and Deutsche
Telekom is pointing registrants to the Federal Data Protection Law
(Germany).
Global Name Registry reports that they had to adjust
their WHOIS service to comply with local law, and that they have
been in touch with the UK Data Commissioner / Information Commissioner.
Proxy Registration Services
The Task Force has also attempted to gather information about
proxy registration services. By this, we mean services that substitute
their contact information for registrants contact information in the
WHOIS service. Usually, these services act as a pro-forma registrant,
and license
the domain name in question to the actual registrant. The Task Force asked
registrars whether they provide such services, and asked
constituencies for anecdotal evidence about the practices of these
services.
Responses received and further independent research yielded the
following list of known proxy services:
- Aplus (known
in registrar listings as Abacus America) offers "unlisted" domain name
registrations through a sister company. (The author of these lines was
not able to find any terms and conditions on their web site, but that
may have something to do with browser compatibility issues.)
- Domains By Proxy is
a sister company of accredited registrar Go Daddy. Terms
and conditions.
- IDdp appears to be affiliated with
accredited registrar Key Systems GmbH. Terms and conditions.
- Registrar Encirca offers to
its customers to replace
their contact information by Encirca's.
- Registrar Network
Solutions is offering a "private registration service" that
displays disposable e-mail addresses and a PO box care of the registrar
in the WHOIS service. Terms
and Conditions.
- enom offers a similar service under the name enom ID Protect.
There is little anecdotic evidence about the conditions under
which proxy services actually give up identifying information
about registrants. The most widely reported incident concerns re-code.com. The domain name had
been registered using Go Daddy's Domains By Proxy service; pseudonymity
of the registrant was lifted upon receipt of a cease
and desist letter from Wal-Mart. Discussion
in Wendy Seltzer's web log; discussion
on nettime-l.
The
Non-Commercial Users' Constituency points out in its submission
that the standard proxy situation means that an additional, and
possibly unscrupulous, intermediary is introduced into the contractual
relationship between registrar and registrant. That party then has the
ability to do whatever it wants with the registered domain name.
Registrant Information and Consent
[TBD]
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|