<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] 100 year domain registration
- To: Registrars Constituency and observers <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] 100 year domain registration
- From: Darshaun Nadeau <dnadeau@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:40:17 +0900
- In-reply-to: <C46E1861.11E06%jlin@007names.com>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <C46E1861.11E06%jlin@007names.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, I think you are correct...:=)
Not only with com/net, etc. but also with lots more extensions...so
this has not been an issue of contract/policy violation? Or am I just
entering a conversation too late. Maybe this was already discussed/
resolved years ago when the others began the 100 year registration
service...
Sorry if this has already been a topic of discussion. If so, can
someone point me to the archives of this discussion?
Thanks-
On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Joyce Lin wrote:
Surprise, surprise! They are very late!
I think they just copied that from a couple of big registrars in
the USA.
Joyce
From: Darshaun Nadeau <dnadeau@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:22:05 +0900
To: Registrars Constituency and observers <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [registrars] 100 year domain registration
Hello,
There is a company in Japan that just started 100 year domain
registrations. Does anyone know if this violates any policies,
rules, regulations, etc.? If so, specifics would be most
appreciated (which contract, etc.)
Thank you,
Darshaun Nadeau
GMO Internet, Inc.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|