<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Call for action - GNSO motion on Domain Tasting
- To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Call for action - GNSO motion on Domain Tasting
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:49:08 +1000
- In-reply-to: <01ab01c89a7f$c21acec0$4206a8c0@internal.directi.com>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <01ab01c89a7f$c21acec0$4206a8c0@internal.directi.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AciY+6Uq0dpzW9OIQNydEY6SFgw8ogAqc9FQAEgb+/A=
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Call for action - GNSO motion on Domain Tasting
Hello Bhavin,
>
> * Given that the Board has already approved a 20 cent ICANN
> fee to curb
> Domain Tasting, and only the implementation thereof remains
> pending, it does
> not make sense for additional overlapping solutions
> especially ones that are
> onerous and out of the bounds of the scope of the problem itself
The Board has not "approved' a 20 cent fee, the Board has proposed this
as part of the budget process - which is subject to comment, and won't
be finalised until presumably June 08. So the registrars constituency
is free to propose alternative models, and the GNSO is free to recommend
policy related to this area.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|