<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] WG: [council] Domain Tasting Design Team Proposed GNSO Council Motion
- To: russ@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [registrars] WG: [council] Domain Tasting Design Team Proposed GNSO Council Motion
- From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:33:24 -0500
- Cc: Jeffrey Eckhaus <jeckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <47AC83CD.7040304@tidewinds.com>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <00b801c86a41$47f92d30$fa0d11ac@1und1.domain> <B231D476A3789B4ABEAED0CA1B12996306F8A665@EXCHANGE.rcom.com> <7D046EE6-E885-45C1-BA56-2DEFCE5930E5@tucows.com> <47AC83CD.7040304@tidewinds.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 8-Feb-08, at 11:31 AM, Russ Goodwin wrote:
There are probably ways to change the tests so they can be done for
free, but then the impact on registrars is not negligible.
I'm not sure that we get the luxury of picking low cost and low
impact. I think its perfectly fair for us to pay for a low impact
approach, but also have the ability to avoid the cost if we choose a
higher impact method.
Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com
"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|