RE: AW: [registrars] WG: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 20 November 2007

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Since no one else has expressed an interest, I would encourage the ExCom
to agree to appoint Ross.

Tim 


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: AW: [registrars] WG: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 20
November 2007
From: "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, December 04, 2007 9:44 am
To: "'Ross Rader'" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Hi Ross,

you got certainly my support.

Best,

tom

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Ross Rader
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2007 16:24
An: Ross Rader
Cc: Registrars Constituency
Betreff: Re: [registrars] WG: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 20
November
2007


Its been two weeks since Tim sent out the original message. Is this
still a
live issue? Some sort of minimal communication back on this would be
helpful...

On 27-Nov-07, at 9:16 AM, Ross Rader wrote:

>
> Any update on this?
>
> On 21-Nov-07, at 11:31 AM, Ross Rader wrote:
>
>>
>> Happy to help. Glad to see this move forward.
>>
>> ---
>> Warm regards,
>>
>> -Ross
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So Resolution 2 has intiated a PDP on the reasons for denial of
>>> transfers. Since it was decided to do it without a Task Force (as
>>> was the case with the Tasting PDP), we once again need to appoint a
>>> representative (this is not a task force rep) to solicit RC views
>>> and draft a statement.
>>>
>>> The appointment is supposed to be done within 10 calendar days, and
>>> the statement submitted within 35 calendar days of the initiation of
>>> the PDP on 20 Nov. Of course, once again, there is no way to hold an
>>> election for a representative within 10 days.
>>>
>>> I propose that based on 4.1, 4.1.1. and 4.1.4. of our bylaws (quoted
>>> below) that the ExCom request that any members interested in
>>> performing this function let them know and then the ExCom would
>>> discuss and make an appointment. It will still be a tight fit to
>>> solicit views, create a statement, and get it submitted within the
>>> 35 days even if it is fast tracked. But it we hold an election
>>> first, we will be at least a month late if not more.
>>>
>>> 4.1. The Executive Committee may divide its duties and
>>> responsibilities among the Members as it sees fit and conduct its
>>> business as it finds necessary. Responsibilities of the Executive
>>> Committee shall
>>> include:
>>>
>>> 4.1.1. Coordinators; Sub-Committees. The Executive Committee may
>>> appoint "Coordinators" charged with functional supervision of
>>> activities such as membership.
>>>
>>> 4.1.4. Policy Recommendations. The Executive Committee shall be
>>> charged with broadly considering Constituency policies and making
>>> appropriate recommendations to the Members.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: [registrars] WG: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 20
>>> November 2007
>>> From: "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Wed, November 21, 2007 8:16 am
>>> To: <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> fyi, the outcome of yesterdays council call.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> tom
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ]
>>> Im
>>> Auftrag von GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. November 2007 15:13
>>> An: 'Council GNSO'
>>> Betreff: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 20 November 2007
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Council Members,
>>>
>>> Ahead of the complete minutes, please find the resolutions that were
>>> passed by the GNSO Council teleconference on Tuesday 20 November
>>> 2007.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Glen
>>>
............................................................................
..
>>> Resolution 1
>>>
>>> Whereas, the Council has previously requested and received both the
>>> 15 June
>>> 2007 "GNSO Issues Report on Dispute Handling for IGO Names and
>>> Abbreviations"
>>> http://www.gnso.icann.org/issues/igo-names/issues-report-igo-drp-15j
>>> un07.pdf and the 28 September 2007 "Staff Report on Draft IGO Domain
>>> Name Dispute Resolution Procedure;"
>>> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-igo-drp-report-v2-28sep07.pdf
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> Whereas, the Council believes that further work on the draft IGO
>>> Domain
>>> Name
>>> Dispute Resolution Procedure is appropriate before voting on
>>> whether to
>>> initiate a policy development process on this issue; and
>>>
>>> Whereas, the Intellectual Property Constituency is drafting and
>>> expects
>>> to
>>> distribute not later than 28 November a revised proposed draft
>>> dispute
>>> resolution procedure,
>>>
>>> Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Council postpones until
>>> its 20
>>> December meeting the vote on whether to initiate a policy
>>> development
>>> process.
>>>
>>> Resolution 2
>>>
>>> Whereas the issues report on Inter-Registrar Transfers
>>>
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/transfers/issues-report-transfer-denial-clarifi
>>> cations-19oct07.pdf
>>>
>>> has been released and discussed
>>>
>>> The GNSO council resolves to initiate a PDP to address the issues
>>> set
>>> forth
>>> in the Issues Report by the Staff.
>>>
>>> Resolution 3 failed
>>>
>>> Whereas the Council has decided to initiate a PDP on Inter-registrar
>>> Transfers, a Task Force will be created according to the By-laws,
>>> section 5
>>> of Annex A of the GNSO Policy Development Process.
>>>
>>> Thus
>>>
>>> Pursuant to the ICANN Bylaws
>>> http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#AnnexA-8
>>> 8. Procedure if No Task Force is Formed
>>>
>>> a. If the Council decides not to convene a task force, the Council
>>> will
>>> request that, within ten (10) calendar days thereafter, each
>>> constituency
>>> appoint a representative to solicit the constituency's views on the
>>> issue.
>>> Each such representative shall be asked to submit a Constituency
>>> Statement
>>> to the Staff Manager within thirty-five (35) calendar days after
>>> initiation
>>> of the PDP.
>>>
>>> b. The Council may also pursue other options that it deems
>>> appropriate
>>> to assist in the PDP, including appointing a particular individual
>>> or
>>> organization to gather information on the issue or scheduling
>>> meetings
>>> for
>>> deliberation or briefing. All such information shall be submitted
>>> to the
>>> Staff Manager within thirty-five (35) calendar days after
>>> initiation of
>>> the
>>> PDP.
>>>
>>> c. The Staff Manager will take all Constituency Statements, Public
>>> Comment Statements, and other information and compile (and post on
>>> the
>>> Comment Site) an Initial Report within fifty (50) calendar days
>>> after
>>> initiation of the PDP. Thereafter, the PDP shall follow the
>>> provisions
>>> of
>>> Item 9 below in creating a Final Report.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Glen de Saint Géry
>>> GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
>>> gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
>>> http://gnso.icann.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Ross Rader
> Director, Retail Services
> t. 416.538.5492
> c. 416.828.8783
> http://www.domaindirect.com
>
> "To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
> - Erik Nupponen
>
>
>
>
>

Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com

"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen